Teams

LBK Club Gutridge

2022 Sarasota Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 W Wednesday

13 players · average NTRP 3.38 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-03-23vs Cedars HowardLost 01
L#2 DoublesJudy Kozlowski / Catherine Tomass vs Kimberly Howard / Terry Olsen4-6, 4-6
2022-03-21Won 10
W#1 DoublesMary Piotrowski / Ann Miklas vs Debra Williams / Cara Callahan2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-03-09vs LBK Public GleasonLost 01
L#2 DoublesJudy Kozlowski / Catherine Tomass vs Erin Neufelder / Irene Langlois2-6, 4-6
2022-03-02Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJudy Kozlowski / Jana Bekavac vs Anny Rosen / Irene Baggio2-6, 1-6
2022-02-23Won 10
W#1 DoublesAnn Miklas / Malgorzata Pilch vs Kori White / Kim Towe7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2022-02-16vs Sarasota - Payne Park/PerhaesLost 01
L#1 DoublesMalgorzata Pilch / Judy Kozlowski vs Nancy Platkin - * / Jane Welihozkiy3-6, 1-6
2022-01-26vs Sarasota National BrosnanSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAnn Miklas / Mary Piotrowski vs Lou Ann Hippensteel / Suzanne Brosnan6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJudy Kozlowski / Marcia Gutridge vs Elizabeth Guest / Nancy Sincoski1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 W Wednesday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Ann Miklas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.46
Cyn Gillespie
published 3.5
Catherine Tomass
published 3.5
Geri Brown
published 3
2.58
Ruth Meadows
published
Ann Fangue
published
Jana Bekavac
published
Jennifer Esposito
published
Judy Kozlowski
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Malgorzata Pilch
published
Marcia Gutridge
published
Michelle Harkins
published
Susan Pluss
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ruth Meadows + Susan Pluss123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ann Miklas
109W–67L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Cyn Gillespie
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Catherine Tomass
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Geri Brown
1W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Ruth Meadows
71W–60L career · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
2.58
Ann Fangue
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jana Bekavac
9W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jennifer Esposito
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Judy Kozlowski
9W–24L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Malgorzata Pilch
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Marcia Gutridge
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Michelle Harkins
2W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan Pluss
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.