Teams

KBlevins

2022 Capital Combo 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-10-10vs MGillLost 02
L#2 DoublesKay Bonavita / Joanne Cross vs Manjula Nagaraja / Melanie Gill1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesTerri Bartucca / Allison Lee vs Meta Bartley / Jenna Cobb3-6, 3-6
2022-09-19vs MBiringer/NRCC FallLost 02
L#1 DoublesKelly Talbot / Kay Bonavita vs Marciny Trice / Mallory Biringer0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesErin Maher / Terri Bartucca vs Adria McGlamery / Lindsey Taylor5-7, 3-6
2022-09-12vs MParisLost 01
L#1 DoublesTerri Bartucca / Caitlin Rhyne vs Meghan Paris / April Taylor0-6, 3-6
2022-08-29Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKay Bonavita / Kelly Talbot vs Paxton Sickler / Addison Stallings6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2022-08-22vs LHammondWon 10
W#1 DoublesTerri Bartucca / Erin Maher vs Miriam Waters / Michelle Metelo6-3, 6-4
2022-08-15vs JKomesWon 10
W#1 DoublesTerri Bartucca / Erin Maher vs Jeannette Brown / Valerie Clowes5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2022-08-08vs LMcReeLost 01
L#1 DoublesTerri Bartucca / Kay Bonavita vs Katherine King / Naomi Rodrigues1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.54 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Terri Bartucca
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.76
Kay Bonavita
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.75
Kelly Talbot
published
2.70
Erin Maher
published 3
2.57
Kelly Blevins
published
2.40
Vina Jordano
published
2.32
Nicole Nemmers
published
2.18
Sarah Ammirati
published
2.17
Joanne Cross
published
Lesley Russo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kay Bonavita + Terri Bartucca12660% games+5.8% vs expected
Kelly Blevins + Kelly Talbot123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Terri Bartucca
113W–65L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Kay Bonavita
75W–54L career · 7 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
2.76
Kelly Talbot
6W–6L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Erin Maher
10W–7L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.70
Kelly Blevins
12W–8L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
2.57
Vina Jordano
17W–8L career · no lines in 2022
0%78%22%
2.40
Nicole Nemmers
10W–10L career · no lines in 2022
0%91%9%
2.32
Sarah Ammirati
7W–5L career · no lines in 2022
0%99%1%
2.18
Joanne Cross
6W–2L career · no lines in 2022
0%99%1%
2.17
Lesley Russo
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.