Teams

Moco Match Makers

2023 Montgomery Adult Other Fall Weekday Women · Montgomery Adult Other 4.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.62 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-12-13vs WesleyLost 01
L#2 DoublesAnne Pyne / Christine Nowack vs Jennifer Kearney / Jenelle Langen2-6, 4-6
2023-12-07vs Point BreakersLost 01
L#2 DoublesChristine Nowack / Stephanie Hooker vs Robin Brille / Frankie Lawrence6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2023-11-27vs MagginLost 02
L#1 DoublesShannon Hockey / Julie Seils vs Meredith Berlin / Cheryl Hays2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCarroll Drewyer / Christine Nowack vs Nita Kramer / Blythe McGinty6-7, 3-6
2023-11-15vs Block/CopelandWon 10
W#2 DoublesShannon Hockey / Stephanie Hooker vs Lynn Daggett / Cecilia Parker6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2023-11-10vs Manor 4.0Lost 01
L#3 DoublesDenise Kolker / Christine Nowack vs Amy Burgoyne / Kelley Donellan6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2023-11-02vs Love BugsLost 01
L#3 DoublesChristine Nowack / Natalie von Seelen vs Page Dekker / Lori Rodman3-6, 1-6
2023-10-23vs Callahan/koeleSplit 11
L#2 DoublesShannon Hockey / Pamela Hjelle vs Christine Pagendarm / Melissa Truffer3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesNancy Hull / Christine Nowack vs Laura Haney / Sabrina Alban6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult Other 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Natalie Smith
published
3.73
Pamela Hjelle
published
3.71
Julie Seils
published
3.69
Anne Pyne
published 4
3.46
Christine Nowack
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.43
Shannon Hockey
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Stephanie Hooker
published
3.24
Nancy Hull
published
3.23
Amber Surmiller
published 3.5
Mimi Britschge
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Seils + Shannon Hockey314 matchesnot enough data
Shannon Hockey + Christine Nowack044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natalie Smith
49W–31L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.78
Pamela Hjelle
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
Julie Seils
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Anne Pyne
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
8%92%1%
3.69
3.5
Christine Nowack
45W–39L career · 10 lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Shannon Hockey
34W–34L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.43
Stephanie Hooker
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
Nancy Hull
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Amber Surmiller
22W–37L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
Mimi Britschge
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.