Teams

Valley Creek

Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.46 / PHILADELPHIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-08vs Frog 55+ ZieskeWon 21
L#1 DoublesLauren Dunbar / Krista McGrath vs Jennifer Arevalo / Margaret Mary Fesnak3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDenise Reilly / Diane Janiec vs Susan Clarke / Renee DiDomizio6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSusan Quake / Christy Saddic-Cosgrove vs Lisa Zieske / Sue Borowy6-0, 7-6
2026-08-02vs Frog 55+ ZieskeLost 12
L#1 DoublesDiane Janiec / Krista McGrath vs Margaret Mary Fesnak / Jennifer Arevalo5-7, 0-5
W#2 DoublesChristy Saddic-Cosgrove / Karen Wertz vs Suzy Dowell / Michelle McCall6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesSue McDevitt / Julie Romfh vs Sue Borowy / Lisa Sanft4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-08-01vs Gino's GalsWon 30
W#1 DoublesAmy Fritsch / Lisa Matherson vs Min Foga / Lori Gotzis7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKaren Wertz / Denise Reilly vs Jennifer Caissie / Rachel McGowan6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSusan Barry / Dawn Mullen vs Dawn Strivieri / JANET van MOL6-1, 6-4
2026-07-11vs Gino's GalsWon 21
W#1 DoublesKrista McGrath / Diane Janiec vs Rosario Rottenborn / Tong Zhang6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSusan Quake / Lauren Dunbar vs Francine Durcan / Christina Bohn3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSusan Barry / Dawn Mullen vs Jennifer Caissie / JANET van MOL6-4, 6-4
2026-06-21vs Frog 55+ ZieskeWon 21
L#1 DoublesAmy Fritsch / Lisa Matherson vs Jennifer Arevalo / Margaret Mary Fesnak4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJanet Rodden / Susan Quake vs Betsy Madway / Suzy Dowell4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLauren Dunbar / Julie Romfh vs Lisa Zieske / Susan Clarke6-1, 6-4
2026-06-14vs Gino's GalsLost 12
W#1 DoublesLisa Matherson / Amy Fritsch vs Jennifer Caissie / Barbara Keen6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSusan Quake / Christy Saddic-Cosgrove vs Tina Gonzalez / Dawn Strivieri7-5, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSue McDevitt / Janet Rodden vs Rachel Juliana / Kimberly Park0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Amy Fritsch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.48
Diane Janiec
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.40
Karen Wertz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Krista McGrath
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.32
Christy Saddic-Cosgrove
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Dawn Mullen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Janet Rodden
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.26
Denise Reilly
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Lisa Matherson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Susan Quake
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.17
Sue McDevitt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.98
Lauren Dunbar
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.95
Julie Romfh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Susan Barry
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Matherson + Amy Fritsch7455% games+3.7% vs expected
Lisa Matherson + Christy Saddic-Cosgrove4254% games+2.7% vs expected
Janet Rodden + Krista McGrath2551% games+1.4% vs expected
Janet Rodden + Dawn Mullen11557% games+1.1% vs expected
Krista McGrath + Susan Quake7655% games+0.3% vs expected
Christy Saddic-Cosgrove + Susan Quake6156% games−0.3% vs expected
Denise Reilly + Diane Janiec161453% games−1.0% vs expected
Karen Wertz + Lauren Dunbar4848% games−3.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amy Fritsch
135W–90L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Diane Janiec
34W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Karen Wertz
82W–61L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Krista McGrath
51W–64L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Christy Saddic-Cosgrove
111W–86L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Dawn Mullen
73W–77L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Janet Rodden
69W–59L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Denise Reilly
54W–37L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Lisa Matherson
86W–61L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Susan Quake
81W–68L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Sue McDevitt
63W–66L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
3.17
Lauren Dunbar
49W–69L career · 3 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
2.98
3
Julie Romfh
29W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
2.95
Susan Barry
32W–24L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.