Teams

SB LLW-Smash-Jessie Davidson

Adult 18 & Over - SB · SB - Women - 3.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-21vs Pershing-Rally GirlsWon 21
W#1 DoublesJessie Davidson / Erica Woodburn vs Julie Hirsch / Ingrid Kaczender6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMaria Wallis / Kim Kotnik vs Usha DeMatteo / Tara Fooks2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesNina Dall Armi / Megan Hepburn vs Susan Bender / Jenny Killgore4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-06-14vs SBTC-Aperol AcesWon 21
W#1 DoublesJessie Davidson / Erica Woodburn vs Darcie Burk / Elizabeth Heron7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKim Kotnik / Nina Dall Armi vs Erin Shaffer / Brenda Dentinger7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMaria Wallis / Rachel Bishar vs Rochelle Glasspoole / Jill Byron-Salzman2-6, 1-6
2026-05-31vs Pershing-Rally GirlsWon 21
W#1 DoublesLilia Hine / Erica Woodburn vs Julie Hirsch / Jane Van Brussel6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKim Kotnik / Megan Hepburn vs Nicole de la Cruz / Rebecca Young7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMaria Wallis / Kathy Castaneda vs Jenny Killgore / Susan Bender2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-05-24vs SBTC-Aperol AcesLost 12
W#1 DoublesLilia Hine / Jessie Davidson vs Darcie Burk / Elizabeth Heron6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesErica Woodburn / Rachel Bishar vs Christy Janka / Nadine Gilles2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJulie Proctor / Kim Kotnik vs Jill Byron-Salzman / Brenda Dentinger6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2026-05-17vs SBTC-Aperol AcesWon 20
W#1 DoublesBrittany Drozd / Julie Proctor vs Darcie Burk / Renee Houston6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJessie Davidson / Nina Dall Armi vs Jill Byron-Salzman / Christy Janka7-6, 6-0
2026-05-10vs Pershing-Rally GirlsLost 12
L#1 DoublesJessie Davidson / Erica Woodburn vs Jane Van Brussel / Julie Hirsch4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesBrittany Drozd / Rachel Bishar vs Ingrid Kaczender / Julie Mickelberry7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNina Dall Armi / Megan Hepburn vs Nicole de la Cruz / Usha DeMatteo3-6, 3-6
2026-04-19vs Pershing-Rally GirlsWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrittany Drozd / Kim Kotnik vs Ingrid Kaczender / Julie Mickelberry6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJessie Davidson / Erica Woodburn vs Usha DeMatteo / Julie Hirsch6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRachel Bishar / Lilia Hine vs Elizabeth Diaz / Tara Fooks7-6, 6-4
2026-04-12vs SBTC-Aperol AcesLost 12
W#1 DoublesLilia Hine / Nina Dall Armi vs Renee Houston / Darcie Burk6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesKim Kotnik / Megan Hepburn vs Brenda Dentinger / Karen Montgomery5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesErica Woodburn / Jessie Davidson vs Jill Byron-Salzman / Elizabeth Heron7-5, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · SB - Women - 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SB LLW-Smash-Jessie Davidson5315922211
2Pershing-Rally Girls53121229223

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Jessie Davidson
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.76
Erica Woodburn
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.76
Kim Kotnik
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
2.74
Nina Dall Armi
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.74
Brittany Drozd
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.67
Lilia Hine
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.64
Rachel Bishar
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.62
Megan Hepburn
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.49
Maria Wallis
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Julie Proctor
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Kathy Castaneda
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erica Woodburn + Jessie Davidson6456% games+19.8% vs expected
Kim Kotnik + Rachel Bishar134 matchesnot enough data
Kim Kotnik + Megan Hepburn123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jessie Davidson
11W–5L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.04
Erica Woodburn
8W–7L career · 7 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
Kim Kotnik
6W–8L career · 7 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
Nina Dall Armi
5W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Brittany Drozd
5W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
Lilia Hine
9W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
Rachel Bishar
5W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
2.64
Megan Hepburn
2W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
2.62
Maria Wallis
0W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
2.49
Julie Proctor
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kathy Castaneda
0W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.