Teams

SGV HFA Girls-Higuera-Downey HS/SA9

2025 Adult Division - 18 & Over San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Women 3.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
W#1 DoublesMegumi Kodama / Guiselle Gonzalez vs Marisa Oh / Aimee Devaul6-1, 6-0
L#1 SinglesAriana Garcia vs Andrea Wong1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAdriana Higuera / Vanessa Vanda vs Deborah Beveridge / Janice Park6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesCorinda Hayes vs Nalini Arora6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLisa Santana / Efe Oghoghome vs Wilda Pong / Shana Lutker6-1, 6-3
W#1 DoublesMegumi Kodama / Ariana Garcia vs Sandra Arroyo / Glorimar Brown6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesCorinda Hayes vs Jane Lee6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLisa Santana / Vanessa Vanda vs Ami Sin / Sandra Liu6-0, 6-3
L#2 SinglesEfe Oghoghome vs Annie Pham3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAdriana Higuera / Kylie Sanchez vs Sherlyn Burns / Jessie Do6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-04-12vs SGV Arcadia Aces-Li-Arcadia-Sa3/5Lost 04
L#1 DoublesAdriana Higuera / Megumi Kodama vs Su Li / Sabrina Chang1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAriana Garcia vs Julia Arnold4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKathy Ochoa / Lisa Santana vs Barb Vetterick / Diep Ho0-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesCorinda Hayes vs Alena Ananyeva2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
Adriana Higuera
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Ariana Garcia
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.90
Vanessa Vanda
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Megumi Kodama
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Guiselle Gonzalez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Lisa Santana
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.50
Corinda Hayes
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.29
Efe Oghoghome
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Kathy Ochoa
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kylie Sanchez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ariana Garcia + Adriana Higuera12263% games+12.5% vs expected
Efe Oghoghome + Lisa Santana224 matchesnot enough data
Ariana Garcia + Megumi Kodama303 matchesnot enough data
Adriana Higuera + Megumi Kodama033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Adriana Higuera
27W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
3
Ariana Garcia
31W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
3.13
Vanessa Vanda
19W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
Megumi Kodama
15W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
2.86
3
Guiselle Gonzalez
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Santana
16W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
2.71
3
Corinda Hayes
7W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
2.50
2.5
Efe Oghoghome
5W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.29
Kathy Ochoa
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kylie Sanchez
1W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.