Teams

PC Dashing Divas - J. Holbrook

2024 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over ESL · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.07 / REGION_3

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-10-30vs TYCC Bakery - C. SimmonsLost 01
L#3 DoublesTyra Hunt / Sheila Brown vs Jennifer Friedman / Kathryn O'Brien0-6, 4-6
2023-10-09vs PC Penn Pirates - J. SawyerLost 01
L#2 DoublesCynthia Scaletta / Betty McIntosh vs Lyda Lindell / Melissa Henderson3-6, 2-6
2023-10-02vs HCC Smoke Show - E. FlitmanLost 01
L#3 DoublesBetty McIntosh / Cynthia Scaletta vs Marisol Cohen / Emelia Flitman5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJulianna Holbrook / Amy Flaherty vs Carmen Heggen / Cindy Arment7-5, 6-3
2023-09-11Won 10
W#1 SinglesTyra Hunt vs Anna Richardson6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.61 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Tyra Hunt
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Danielle Adkins
published 3.5
2.92
Amy Flaherty
published 3
2.78
Christine Assefa
published 3
2.65
Dianna Lott
published 3
2.55
Patricia Smith
published
2.55
Sheila Brown
published
2.55
Jackie Wyckoff
published 3
2.38
Susan Rind
published
2.37
Julianna Holbrook
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
1.99
Cynthia Scaletta
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julianna Holbrook + Cynthia Scaletta52134% games−10.4% vs expected
Julianna Holbrook + Susan Rind134 matchesnot enough data
Patricia Smith + Susan Rind033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Tyra Hunt
107W–99L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Danielle Adkins
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Amy Flaherty
12W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Christine Assefa
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Dianna Lott
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
2.65
Patricia Smith
6W–10L career · no lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
2.55
Sheila Brown
1W–8L career · no lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
2.55
3
Jackie Wyckoff
8W–17L career · no lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
2.55
Susan Rind
1W–13L career · no lines in 2024
81%19%<1%
2.38
Julianna Holbrook
60W–151L career · 2 lines in 2024
84%16%<1%
2.37
2.5
Cynthia Scaletta
46W–85L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.99

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.