Teams

SD WD LLW 3.5 Balboa Alley Cats/ Mallory

2024 SoCal Fall Doubles- SD WD · SD - Women - 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.62 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-11-21vs SD 3.5 PTC/ WoodWon 20
W#1 DoublesLisa Mallory / Jaimee Brant vs Charlotte Francovalle / Jennifer Alioto Oliver6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDiane Edge / Peggy Cuppy vs Lisa Carey / Jo Ann Stewart7-5, 6-2
2024-11-14vs SD 3.5 Pacific Beach/ LevineWon 20
W#1 DoublesAshley Bull / Jaimee Brant vs Victoria Pearce / Ciara Levine6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTori Penick / Jacinthe Pare vs Pam Trent / Patricia Brennan6-4, 6-3
2024-11-07vs SD 3.5 LJTC/ BrunoWon 21
W#1 DoublesJaimee Brant / Katy Falkowski vs Jessica Shehab / Carolyn Pringle6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLisa Mallory / Jacinthe Pare vs Sarah Bruno / Mariko Uyeda6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDiane Edge / Peggy Cuppy vs Holly Henderson / Kiska Higgs3-6, 2-6
2024-10-31vs SD 3.5 LJ B&TC/ YoungWon 20
W#1 DoublesAshley Bull / Jaimee Brant vs Cari Massaad / Jessica Rogge6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKaty Falkowski / Jacinthe Pare vs Kristen Patterson / Jennifer Greenfield6-4, 6-3
2024-10-24vs SD 3.5 SDTRC/ PeinadoWon 30
W#1 DoublesJaimee Brant / Katy Falkowski vs Kelly Wilson / Paige Hazard6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLisa Mallory / Jacinthe Pare vs Nancy Peinado / Claudia Gallego Gutierrez6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAnna Brigham / Carol Morris vs Elyse Wurster / Paula Colarusso6-1, 6-3
2024-10-17vs SD 3.5 Mtn View/ IxtlahuacWon 30
W#1 DoublesAshley Bull / Jaimee Brant vs Debbie Nowakowski / Erika Lopez6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTori Penick / Katy Falkowski vs Lisa Shirley / Herta Ixtlahuac6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesLisa Mallory / Jacinthe Pare vs Noelia Figueroa / Aida Padilla6-0, 6-2
2024-10-10vs SD 3.5 CTC/ WestWon 20
W#1 DoublesJaimee Brant / Ashley Bull vs Jessica Cunningham / Megan West2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAnna Brigham / Peggy Cuppy vs Ruth York / Erin Enrico6-1, 6-4
2024-10-03vs SD 3.5 Mtn View/ PonceWon 21
W#1 DoublesAshley Bull / Jaimee Brant vs Celina Tiznado / Sara Fairbank6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTori Penick / Jacinthe Pare vs Alicia S Molina / JACQUELINE SAENZ7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesPeggy Cuppy / Anna Brigham vs Lilyan Ruiz / Elsa Dominguez4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-09-19vs SD 3.5 SDTRC/ Monzon & GarveyWon 21
W#1 DoublesAshley Bull / Jaimee Brant vs Carrie Musicant / Krista Losito6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJacinthe Pare / Tori Penick vs Ana Mariela Gamiz / Mary Garvey4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAnna Brigham / Lucia Lazio vs Alisa Le / Erica Meyer7-6, 6-0
2024-09-12vs SD 3.5 CTC/ SchmiedWon 20
W#1 DoublesAshley Bull / Jaimee Brant vs Maria Simon / Anne Rinko6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLisa Mallory / Anna Brigham vs Heather Grimes / Ana Paula Gonzalez6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Jaimee Brant
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.78
Ashley Bull
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.36
Jacinthe Pare
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.35
Diane Edge
published 3.5
3.33
HELEN LARSONGARCIA
published
3.28
Tori Penick
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Peggy Cuppy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Anna Brigham
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.99
Carol Morris
published 3.5
Katy Falkowski
published
Lisa Hunter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ashley Bull + Jaimee Brant14267% games+14.3% vs expected
Peggy Cuppy + Jacinthe Pare9256% games+6.1% vs expected
Anna Brigham + Tori Penick4549% games+1.7% vs expected
Jacinthe Pare + Tori Penick9850% games−6.3% vs expected
Peggy Cuppy + Anna Brigham6950% gamesnot enough data
Jacinthe Pare + Anna Brigham4250% gamesnot enough data
Jacinthe Pare + Jaimee Brant3259% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jaimee Brant
64W–36L career · 14 lines in 2024
<1%65%34%
3.94
4
Ashley Bull
27W–17L career · 7 lines in 2024
2%92%5%
3.78
3.5
Jacinthe Pare
67W–36L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%84%15%
3.36
3.5
Diane Edge
9W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%14%
3.35
HELEN LARSONGARCIA
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
89%11%<1%
3.33
3.5
Tori Penick
49W–34L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Peggy Cuppy
42W–51L career · 4 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Anna Brigham
56W–50L career · 5 lines in 2024
4%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Carol Morris
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
54%46%<1%
2.99
Katy Falkowski
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lisa Hunter
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.