Teams

WP RED

2026 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-26vs WP BLUELost 14
L#1 DoublesJames Holub / Kirk Magill vs Chris Cramer / Chris Merman3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesMario Crobu vs Isaiah Straubel2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesVinay Vishwanath / Hicham Zhiri vs Wade Westphal / Mark Helman6-1, 6-3
L#2 SinglesPil Kim vs Scott Ziemke2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Dalessio / Konstantin Gradushy vs Chris Rudolph / Abraham Cruz2-6, 2-6
2026-05-19vs CP BRONZESplit 22
W#1 DoublesBrett Denkler / Cam Weprin vs Dave Dombrowski / Jason Ortiz3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMario Crobu vs Peter Horsch6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKonstantin Gradushy / James Holub vs John Endrud / Austin Scott5-7, 1-6
L#2 SinglesPil Kim vs Kevin Stratman5-7, 1-6
2026-05-12vs DTC BLUELost 05
L#1 DoublesBrett Denkler / Cam Weprin vs Daniel Yamagishi / Louis Bissette6-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMario Crobu vs Norman Farquhar0-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChuck King / John Dalessio vs James Sutton / Scott Kempton4-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesHicham Zhiri vs Ari Opsahl2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKonstantin Gradushy / John Davis vs Neil Nowak / Milan Doshi1-6, 2-6
2026-05-10vs CM NAVYLost 04
L#1 DoublesMario Crobu / Cam Weprin vs Christopher Hailes / Chris Chang2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKonstantin Gradushy / Kirk Magill vs Brewster Boyd / Zakhar Kravtsov1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesJames Holub vs Jason Rutkofsky0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Dalessio / Pil Kim vs Nathan Landrey / Russell Sedmak6-1, 0-6, 0-1
2026-04-28vs SKY REDLost 04
L#1 DoublesVinay Vishwanath / Hicham Zhiri vs Chad Cleveland / Brooks Pearson6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesBrett Denkler vs Andrew Hagen0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKirk Magill / James Holub vs Bentley Hodges / Brian Dwyer0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesChuck King / Konstantin Gradushy vs Robert Graham / Ben Wright3-6, 3-6
2026-04-21vs EM GOLDWon 41
W#1 DoublesBrett Denkler / John Dalessio vs Beattie Leonard / Martin Gaeth4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesPil Kim vs Rupert Galvez7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesHicham Zhiri / Vinay Vishwanath vs Brian Tanner / Matthew Basky4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesCam Weprin vs Adam Davy6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesChuck King / Konstantin Gradushy vs Ken Huskey / Todd Johnson6-3, 6-4
2026-04-14vs CACM REDWon 32
L#1 DoublesBrett Denkler / James Holub vs John Anadiotis / Jeff Kinzler1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesCam Weprin vs Derek McAnnar6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKirk Magill / John Dalessio vs David Duganne / Jay Rael4-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesMario Crobu vs Michael Vieau4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHicham Zhiri / Vinay Vishwanath vs Jerry Barnhill / Patrick Broe6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Cam Weprin
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.33
Vinay Vishwanath
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.33
Mario Crobu
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.26
Hicham Zhiri
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.25
Brett Denkler
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.23
Pil Kim
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.22
John Dalessio
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.03
Kirk Magill
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.01
Konstantin Gradushy
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.96
James Holub
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hicham Zhiri + Vinay Vishwanath4258% games+5.9% vs expected
James Holub + Kirk Magill044 matchesnot enough data
Mario Crobu + Hicham Zhiri123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cam Weprin
18W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%45%55%
3.52
Vinay Vishwanath
7W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%88%12%
3.33
Mario Crobu
17W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
Hicham Zhiri
9W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%92%4%
3.26
3.5
Brett Denkler
5W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Pil Kim
12W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
John Dalessio
1W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Kirk Magill
0W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
3.03
Konstantin Gradushy
4W–20L career · 6 lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
3.01
James Holub
0W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
2.96

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.