Teams

Richards/Memphis

2025 Adult 18 & Over -Memphis · 4.0 Women 18 & over

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-04-17vs Malone/MemphisLost 02
L#1 DoublesTeresa House-Eley / Dina Vann vs Nicole Amaro / Kelly Kuenzinger3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesAnn Marie Wallace vs Libbie Bouck2-6, 3-6
2025-03-26vs Burbank/MemphisLost 03
L#2 DoublesAnn Marie Wallace / Dina Vann vs Penny Wood-Wiener / Tonia Gardner2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesTina Schneiderman vs Kristen Alexander0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLaurita Jackson / Teresa House-Eley vs Jess Flanders / Kiersten Schnacke3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women 18 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Dina Vann
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.24
Tina Schneiderman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.20
Grace Bann
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.19
Ann Marie Wallace
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.18
Susana Cunningham
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Omitope Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Constance Dyson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.04
Laurita Jackson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.90
Sandra Richards
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jacqueline Sharp
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Teresa House-Eley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Dina Vann
3W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
3.43
Tina Schneiderman
23W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Grace Bann
31W–37L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Ann Marie Wallace
2W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Susana Cunningham
7W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Omitope Taylor
5W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Constance Dyson
3W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
Laurita Jackson
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.04
Sandra Richards
3W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
75%25%<1%
2.90
Jacqueline Sharp
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Teresa House-Eley
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.