Teams

CGress (Matthews Tennis Club)

2022 Mixed Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Mixed 6.0 - Mon PM

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-01vs KMacrone (Park Road)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesVirginia Borkey / ED BORKEY vs Heidy Bartell / RONALD TOWNSEND6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2022-07-13vs TFailla/FGrindle (Weddington)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesPeggy Reimann / Andy Hunt vs Mike Gentile / Tasha Cooper3-6, 4-6
2022-07-11vs WSolomon (Queens)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesPeggy Reimann / Andy Hunt vs Katie Sarjeant / Frederick Whitney4-6, 4-6
2022-06-27vs KStaley (Weddington)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesAndy Hunt / Peggy Reimann vs Billy Stover / Stacey Herndon3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesED BORKEY / Virginia Borkey vs Alberto Botero / Sandra Torres0-6, 0-6
2022-06-20vs NBrasch (PCC)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesVirginia Borkey / ED BORKEY vs Anna Troppmann / Tyler Troppmann0-6, 0-6
2022-06-13vs JMiles (Life Time)Won 10
W#1 DoublesPeggy Reimann / Andy Hunt vs Katie Kuehner / Rob Wachter6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Mixed 6.0 - Mon PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
Tom Gill
published
3.12
Peggy Reimann
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.97
Andy Hunt
published 3
2.92
Kathy Lucas
published
2.83
Chris Lucas
published 3
2.71
Carol Gress
published 3
2.36
Virginia Borkey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Ozzie Alvarado
published
Pamela Huggins
published
Paul Gress
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carol Gress + Paul Gress213 matchesnot enough data
Chris Lucas + Kathy Lucas123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tom Gill
11W–17L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.24
3
Peggy Reimann
104W–65L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%17%83%
3.12
3
Andy Hunt
10W–21L career · no lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
2.97
Kathy Lucas
24W–23L career · no lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Chris Lucas
3W–10L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Carol Gress
11W–5L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
2.71
3
Virginia Borkey
23W–56L career · type S · 3 lines in 2022
86%14%<1%
2.36
Ozzie Alvarado
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Pamela Huggins
1W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Paul Gress
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.