Teams

1.MD.Crumpler

2022 CTRL Adult 40 & Over · Adult 40 & Over 4.5 Men

6 players · average NTRP 4.30 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-21vs 4.TOC.LarrichioLost 01
L#1 DoublesChris Crumpler / Vance Jennings vs Steve Faltz / David Bell1-6, 5-7
2022-05-10vs 4.TOC.LarrichioSplit 11
W#1 DoublesVance Jennings / Justin Williams vs Steve Faltz / Tom Larrichio6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesChris Crumpler / James Moriarty vs Mark Townley / David Bruner5-7, 4-6
2022-05-07vs 2.MVL.McClennyLost 01
L#1 DoublesVance Jennings / Jerfi Cicin vs Stephen Laroche / William Jackson3-6, 0-6
2022-04-23Won 10
W#1 DoublesChris Crumpler / Vance Jennings vs David Chiu / Chris Meigs6-3, 7-5
2022-04-09vs 2.MVL.McClennySplit 11
W#1 DoublesVance Jennings / Justin Williams vs Stephen Laroche / Jason Abhau6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChris Crumpler / Byron Espino vs Erik J Erikson / Joe Twer1-6, 3-6
2022-04-07vs 4.TOC.LarrichioLost 02
L#1 DoublesChris Crumpler / Peter Johnson vs Mark Townley / Alex Newman2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJames Moriarty / Vance Jennings vs Steve Faltz / David Bell5-7, 1-6
2022-03-20vs 3.TOC AlbertWon 10
W#1 DoublesChris Crumpler / Jeffrey Cox vs Yubie Albert / Mic Wallace6-1, 6-2
2022-03-12vs 2.MVL.McClennyLost 02
L#1 DoublesVance Jennings / Justin Williams vs Richard McClenny / Ben Cooke6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesChris Crumpler / Jeffrey Cox vs T Brandon Brown / Stephen Laroche2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 40 & Over 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.13 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.41
Eric Sandifer
published 4.5
4.28
Vance Jennings
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4.5
4.22
Chris Crumpler
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.09
Jerfi Cicin
published
Andrew Winzenz
published 4
3.64
James Moriarty
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vance Jennings + Chris Crumpler101351% games−5.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Eric Sandifer
8W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
4.41
4.5
Vance Jennings
106W–79L career · 7 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
4.28
4.5
Chris Crumpler
62W–100L career · 7 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
4.22
Jerfi Cicin
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
4.09
4
Andrew Winzenz
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
James Moriarty
6W–10L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.64

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.