Teams

*4-KMoyung-Eno

2024 Eno River Adult 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult 4.5 Men Weekend

10 players · average NTRP 4.10 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-22vs *5-MHanauer-EnoSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKevin Moyung / Michael Weslander vs Stewart Bible / Zack Czajkowski5-7, 0-6
W#1 SinglesAnil Chawla vs Ryan Sayko6-1, 6-0
2024-04-27vs *6-SLlewellyn-ENO-4.5Split 11
W#1 SinglesAnil Chawla vs Jake Ortiz6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDipen Vyas / Kevin Moyung vs William Clark / Arun Manikumar1-6, 3-6
2024-04-20vs *1-EAnderson-DFCWon 10
W#2 DoublesDipen Vyas / Michael Weslander vs Rod Snyder / Lawrence Herst3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-04-13vs *3-JByrd-EnoLost 02
L#2 DoublesBrian Gustafson / Michael Weslander vs Jackson Naftel / Kwame Owens1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesWilliam Hall / Anil Chawla vs Joel Reiter / Jermaine Byrd3-6, 4-6
2024-04-13vs *8-RMcClenny-EnoSplit 11
W#1 SinglesAnil Chawla vs Alexander Neiberger6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDipen Vyas / Brian Gustafson vs Jason Abhau / Parker Sheridan4-6, 3-6
2024-04-06vs *2-RBerliner-EnoLost 01
L#2 DoublesMichael Weslander / Brian Gustafson vs Nicholas Lau / Sergii Porokh4-6, 3-6
2024-03-16vs *7-SNarayan-CHTCSplit 11
L#2 DoublesDipen Vyas / Justin Fowler vs Ty Bullard / Sravan Narayan4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKevin Moyung / Michael Weslander vs Boyd Blackburn / Kyle Couch3-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 4.5 Men Weekend have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.91 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Patrick Grant
published
4.20
Raymond Xu
published
4.15
Anil Chawla
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.08
Michael Weslander
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 4
4.01
Joshua Lundberg
published
3.82
Jack Hu
published 4
3.81
Scott Scarneo
published
3.73
Justin Fowler
published
3.60
Kevin Moyung
published 4
3.46
Dipen Vyas
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patrick Grant + Raymond Xu4158% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Patrick Grant
20W–23L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
4.21
Raymond Xu
30W–23L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
4.20
4.5
Anil Chawla
63W–49L career · 4 lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
4.15
4
Michael Weslander
218W–93L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%28%72%
4.08
Joshua Lundberg
22W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%46%54%
4.01
4
Jack Hu
29W–16L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.82
Scott Scarneo
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.81
Justin Fowler
9W–20L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Kevin Moyung
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.60
4
Dipen Vyas
42W–141L career · 9 lines in 2024
63%37%<1%
3.46

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.