← Teams

WHRC-Lipke

2024 Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 3.4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Joe Entler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.43
Emily Qi
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.32
Frank Foti
published 3.5
3.31
Jeff Lipke
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
—
Sibyl Jarrett
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.24
Tony Humpage
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.14
Simon Lofts
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Robin Michalisko
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.98
Toni Lipke
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.77
Sara Weinstein
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Results8 ties
2024-05-10Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesJeff Lipke / Toni Eastwood vs Mary Hlady / Monte Gonzales7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSibyl Jarrett / John Kraxberger vs Melanie DeSilva / Russ DeMoss6-1, 6-1
2024-04-27Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesEmily Qi / Tony Humpage vs Sam Ko / Kim Tellin7-6, 7-5
L#2 DoublesSibyl Jarrett / John Kraxberger vs Craig Frasier / Timothea Barnatan6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJeff Lipke / Sara Weinstein vs Paul Harwood / Cathy Gatzke6-4, 6-3
2024-04-20Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesTony Humpage / Emily Qi vs JT Smith / Stephanie Smith3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRobin Michalisko / Tamara Beecroft vs Alan Jones / Stephanie Jones6-1, 5-1
L#3 DoublesSimon Lofts / Catherine Lofts vs Kelley Gaylor / Lee Wilcox6-6
2024-04-12Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesSibyl Jarrett / John Kraxberger vs Andrea Vicino / John Yu6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJeff Lipke / Toni Eastwood vs Manoj Pandya / Angie Lee6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSimon Lofts / Catherine Lofts vs Diana Blebea / Danny Denning6-3, 6-2
2024-04-07Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesSibyl Jarrett / John Kraxberger vs Shaun Anderson / Jerome Deluz6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesEmily Qi / Tony Humpage vs Kathleen Budnick / Paul Best7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesTamara Beecroft / Robin Michalisko vs Vera Vos / Edwin Becker6-3, 6-3
2024-04-06Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesEmily Qi / Tony Humpage vs Wendy Nakatani / Sy Cha6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSibyl Jarrett / John Kraxberger vs Rachel Nies / Corin Nies7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSimon Lofts / Catherine Lofts vs Parul Saxena / JIN PARK6-1, 6-2
2024-03-30Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesSara Weinstein / Joe Entler vs Sarah Bradley / Jeff Anhaltzer6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesEmily Qi / Tony Humpage vs Lisa Cohns / Robert Cohns6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesToni Eastwood / John Kraxberger vs Douglas Metzker / Ann Davidson6-2, 6-3
2024-03-23Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesSibyl Jarrett / John Kraxberger vs Allen VanLeuven / Michele Snyder2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEmily Qi / Tony Humpage vs Douglas Walker / Janice Ackley6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesSimon Lofts / Catherine Lofts vs Steve Snyder / Paula Conway6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Joe Entler
28W–42L career
0%89%11%
3.43
3.5
Emily Qi
87W–54L career
0%92%8%
3.43
3.5
Frank Foti
20W–21L career
3%90%7%
3.32
3.5
Jeff Lipke
106W–86L career
0%99%1%
3.31
3.5
Sibyl Jarrett
36W–73L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Tony Humpage
99W–73L career
1%99%0%
3.24
3.5
Simon Lofts
35W–53L career
12%88%0%
3.14
3.5
Robin Michalisko
31W–44L career
24%76%0%
3.08
3
Toni Lipke
44W–74L career
0%86%14%
2.98
3
Sara Weinstein
12W–27L career
1%98%1%
2.77

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.