Teams

Kiwi - Ramsey

2026 Brevard Combo 18 & Over · 8.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-27vs EFSC - FloresLost 03
L#1 DoublesBrett Lindenberg / Stephen Ramsey vs Jason Abbott / Emilio Ampuero3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRafael Reyes / Keith Schachter vs Daniel Flores / William Honaker4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesChad McCall / Eric Mulhern vs Thomas Eskridge / Jacob Kargauer6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2026-08-20vs Fee - MooreWon 30
W#1 DoublesEric Mulhern / Chad McCall vs Jim Peterson / Rohan Ramdeholl6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesRafael Reyes / Keith Schachter vs Stephen Pokol / Alejandro Carazo6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesStephen Ramsey / Brett Lindenberg vs Garrett Bell / Ricardo Cortez7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.93 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Eric Mulhern
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.12
Matthew Gaboury
published
4.03
Stephen Ramsey
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.94
Keith Schachter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.88
Benjamin Smith
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.88
Chad McCall
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.84
Rafael Reyes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.78
Brett Lindenberg
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.74
Justin Hertzog
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chad McCall + Keith Schachter404 matchesnot enough data
Rafael Reyes + Eric Mulhern213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Eric Mulhern
11W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
4.21
Matthew Gaboury
9W–1L career · no lines in 2026
<1%21%79%
4.12
Stephen Ramsey
6W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
4.03
Keith Schachter
38W–35L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Benjamin Smith
15W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%80%19%
3.88
4
Chad McCall
15W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.88
Rafael Reyes
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
87%13%<1%
3.84
4
Brett Lindenberg
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
Justin Hertzog
32W–41L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.74

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.