Teams

Marco Ymca - Conte

2024 Collier Combo 50 & Over Spring · 6.5 Combo 50 & Over Women Spring

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-05-21vs Isles Of Collier - M. YoungLost 01
L#1 DoublesBetsy Conte / Dawn Jones vs Kelly Deufel / Susan Ward6-7, 4-6
2024-05-07vs Heritage Bay - K. KeillorLost 01
L#2 DoublesBetsy Conte / Trish Zimbalatti vs Jeanette Thevening / Cheryl Copps3-6, 0-6
2024-04-16vs Village Walk Bonita - LaggisLost 01
L#3 DoublesBetsy Conte / Celia Bolzani vs Janice Lose / Patricia Dewan2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Combo 50 & Over Women Spring have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Laraine Segar
published
3.18
Jan Jackman
published
3.16
Marla Hoffman
published
3.12
Peggy Chandler
published
3.11
Sally Mattke
published
3.05
Mary Pavichevich
published
2.96
Janet Oliver
published
2.94
Michele Pallone
published
Betsy Conte
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Erica Wallis
published 3
2.62
Eva Dotti
published 3
2.60
Celia Bolzani
published 3
2.59
Claire Babrowski
published 3
2.59
Susan Rafferty
published
Nancy Liaboe
published
Trish Zimbalatti
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peggy Chandler + Marla Hoffman224 matchesnot enough data
Jan Jackman + Marla Hoffman044 matchesnot enough data
Marla Hoffman + Mary Pavichevich134 matchesnot enough data
Eva Dotti + Betsy Conte213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laraine Segar
22W–29L career · no lines in 2024
9%91%1%
3.18
Jan Jackman
12W–34L career · no lines in 2024
9%91%1%
3.18
Marla Hoffman
36W–34L career · no lines in 2024
11%89%<1%
3.16
Peggy Chandler
10W–17L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.12
Sally Mattke
10W–11L career · no lines in 2024
19%80%<1%
3.11
Mary Pavichevich
9W–15L career · no lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.05
Janet Oliver
10W–18L career · no lines in 2024
64%36%<1%
2.96
Michele Pallone
9W–11L career · no lines in 2024
69%31%<1%
2.94
3
Betsy Conte
212W–172L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Erica Wallis
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Eva Dotti
49W–55L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
2.62
3
Celia Bolzani
7W–20L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
2.60
3
Claire Babrowski
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
2.59
Susan Rafferty
5W–16L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
2.59
Nancy Liaboe
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Trish Zimbalatti
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.