Teams

Wisehaven - KT Farewell

2021 Central Penn Tri-Level League · Mens Tri Level League

18 players · average NTRP 3.94 / CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2020-11-20vs Hershey - Kleckner/KrushWon 21
L#1 DoublesAndrew Clark / Nathan Gambino vs Adam Goepfert / Jordan Shankroff6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNicholas Jones / Ryan Sabados vs Elliott Kleckner / Kevin Rowland4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMarco Tornow / Kevin Moritz vs Kevin Marrs / Randy King6-0, 6-4
2020-11-13vs Hempfield - SumarLost 03
L#1 DoublesKevin Tran / Andrew Clark vs Ben Lehman / Mark Lewis6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJohn McClure / Gary Spangler vs Robert Williams / Noah Ginder1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCarl Strozyk / Marco Tornow vs Joe Schrader / Sean Pyle3-6, 3-6
2020-10-30vs Hempfield - LooseWon 30
W#1 DoublesKevin Tran / Nathan Gambino vs Bernard Ilkhanoff / Pearson Clary7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJustin Rose / Nicholas Jones vs Andy Loose / Gregg Pearson6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLevi Peters / Kevin Moritz vs Saul Cohen / Greg Stauffer6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2020-10-25vs Wisehaven - HackLost 12
L#1 DoublesEric Fritzges / Andrew Clark vs Niko Mucci / Adam Hack6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRyan Sabados / Nicholas Jones vs Patrick Albright / Dylan Ryan7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDouglas Lehigh / Huy Nguyen vs Peter MacLennan / Jonathan Yoder0-6, 2-6
2020-10-16vs Wisehaven - MyersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesEric Fritzges / Tony Deimler vs Devin Lehigh / Sam Innerst6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesHuy Nguyen / Kevin Moritz vs Glenn Grove / JOHN LYNAM6-3, 7-5
2020-10-11vs Hershey - HarndenLost 12
W#1 DoublesKevin Tran / Andrew Clark vs Robert Gallo / Matthew Garman6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDevin Long / Gary Spangler vs Richard Rowley / Wilson Wolfe4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMarco Tornow / Levi Peters vs William Heritage / Marko Resetar4-6, 4-6
2020-10-02vs West Shore - GouseLost 12
W#1 DoublesEric Fritzges / Tony Deimler vs Steven Lubart / MARK VOGEL6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJohn McClure / Devin Long vs Adam Warren / Jesse Beck5-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesCarl Strozyk / Douglas Lehigh vs Chris Gouse / Jonathan Birbeck3-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mens Tri Level League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Tony Deimler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Andrew Clark
published 4.5
4.20
Nathan Gambino
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.90
Kevin Tran
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.76
Ryan Sabados
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Huy Nguyen
published 4
3.64
Gary Spangler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Douglas Lehigh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Devin Long
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.33
Levi Peters
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Marco Tornow
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.99
Carl Strozyk
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Eric Fritzges
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
John McClure
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Justin Rose
published
Kevin Moritz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mikesh Desai
published
Nicholas Jones
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Devin Long + Ryan Sabados3352% games+7.6% vs expected
Justin Rose + Nicholas Jones9062% games+6.2% vs expected
Gary Spangler + Ryan Sabados4461% games+5.2% vs expected
Douglas Lehigh + Kevin Moritz7254% games+5.1% vs expected
Huy Nguyen + Douglas Lehigh6360% games+4.5% vs expected
Gary Spangler + Douglas Lehigh8751% games−1.1% vs expected
Nicholas Jones + Ryan Sabados5257% games−4.4% vs expected
Devin Long + Gary Spangler2841% games−9.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Tony Deimler
104W–62L career · 2 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
4.30
4.5
Andrew Clark
11W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Nathan Gambino
44W–15L career · 2 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
4.20
Kevin Tran
30W–3L career · 3 lines in 2021
77%23%<1%
3.90
4
Ryan Sabados
82W–54L career · 2 lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Huy Nguyen
90W–30L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Gary Spangler
44W–68L career · 2 lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
3.64
4
Douglas Lehigh
65W–57L career · 2 lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
3.59
4
Devin Long
28W–63L career · 2 lines in 2021
27%73%<1%
3.58
Levi Peters
58W–52L career · 2 lines in 2021
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Marco Tornow
85W–78L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
3
Carl Strozyk
33W–42L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%52%48%
2.99
Eric Fritzges
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
John McClure
19W–13L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Justin Rose
22W–13L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Kevin Moritz
53W–30L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Mikesh Desai
16W–7L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Nicholas Jones
68W–27L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.