Teams

LEBTC ORANGE

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.58 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-07-22vs PH TEALLost 03
L#1 DoublesKathleen Samuelli / Tara Simmons vs Melodie Harris / Melanie Lundberg4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesGretchen Burr / Claudia Swanson vs Shawna Morgan / Christin Johnson7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBrooke Sterling / Rhonda Struman vs Cheri Bradley / Gina Maestas3-6, 3-6
2021-07-15vs LEBTC YELLOWLost 12
L#1 DoublesCami Schaefer / Claudia Swanson vs Susana Wanken / Jocelyn Bills3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCathy Sorensen / Rhonda Struman vs Jennifer Jackson / Tammy Gould5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesGretchen Burr / Brooke Sterling vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-07-10vs CK REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesKathleen Samuelli / Brooke Sterling vs Janet Burns / Sandi Plude2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesTara Simmons vs Courtney Carignan3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesGretchen Burr / Rhonda Struman vs Joyce Naylon / Robin Cann7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCami Schaefer / Cathy Sorensen vs Christie Bibeau / Kathe Gouin3-6, 2-5
2021-07-08vs GR REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesKathleen Samuelli / Brooke Sterling vs Ana Cruz / Sue Carmody3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAnn Patel vs Fenny Evers6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCami Schaefer / Cathy Sorensen vs Lisa Killion / Michelle Windemuller6-1, 6-3
2021-06-24vs KC BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesTara Simmons / Brooke Sterling vs Sharon Seemann / Susan Khanna6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesAnn Patel vs Susan Bratschun6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesGretchen Burr / Claudia Swanson vs Kit Fitzgerald / Susan Hartley4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesApril Zesbaugh / Michelle Davis vs Leigh Mattson / Connie Grieshaber7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2021-06-17vs PH TEALLost 03
L#1 DoublesKathleen Samuelli / Tara Simmons vs Melodie Harris / Anne Reese3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesCami Schaefer / Gretchen Burr vs Christin Johnson / Ming Hall4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesClaudia Swanson / Rhonda Struman vs Nhung Van / Gina Maestas2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2021-06-10vs LEBTC YELLOWLost 13
L#1 DoublesClaudia Swanson / Kathleen Samuelli vs Jocelyn Bills / Susana Wanken6-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesAnn Patel vs Maria Banta6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesBrooke Sterling / Tara Simmons vs Angie Thompson / Jennifer Jackson2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesGretchen Burr / Michelle Davis vs Dana Loose / Georgina Guzak4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Ann Patel
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
Brooke Sterling
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.22
Tara Simmons
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.22
Cami Schaefer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.18
Gretchen Burr
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Claudia Swanson
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.11
Kathleen Samuelli
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.96
Rhonda Struman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
April Zesbaugh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Cathy Sorensen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brooke Sterling + Claudia Swanson9754% games+4.0% vs expected
Brooke Sterling + Kathleen Samuelli71348% games−0.4% vs expected
Kathleen Samuelli + Cami Schaefer2450% games−1.5% vs expected
Claudia Swanson + Gretchen Burr131351% games−1.6% vs expected
Kathleen Samuelli + Claudia Swanson151148% games−1.7% vs expected
Claudia Swanson + Cami Schaefer81050% games−3.0% vs expected
Kathleen Samuelli + Tara Simmons4846% games−3.5% vs expected
Cathy Sorensen + Cami Schaefer3449% games−8.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ann Patel
43W–28L career · 3 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.70
3.5
Brooke Sterling
36W–52L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Tara Simmons
81W–41L career · 5 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Cami Schaefer
28W–37L career · 4 lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.22
3.5
Gretchen Burr
86W–95L career · type A · 6 lines in 2021
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Claudia Swanson
67W–60L career · 5 lines in 2021
16%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Kathleen Samuelli
90W–97L career · 5 lines in 2021
19%81%<1%
3.11
Rhonda Struman
22W–26L career · 4 lines in 2021
61%39%<1%
2.96
April Zesbaugh
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Cathy Sorensen
14W–16L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.