Teams

BUTLER/40/4.0/MD/BREC

2026 BR Mixed 40 & Over · 4.0 BR (40&O) Mixed

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-27vs Martin/40/4.0/MD/BRECLost 03
L#1 DoublesLisa Marie Raiford / Danny Lai vs Charles Walters / Tammy Noonan7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTom Crowell / Kelley Butler vs Jeff Martin / Shawna Gardiner3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesHollie Easterling / Justin Miller vs Andree Padial / Martin Padial6-7, 4-6
2026-07-23vs Martin/40/4.0/MD/BRECLost 03
L#1 DoublesHollie Easterling / Danny Lai vs Shawna Gardiner / Dan Gardiner3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJustin Miller / Kathryn Loveless vs Allison Rovira / Charles Walters5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKaty Almond / Nam Nguyen vs Heather Brown / Ryan Farrell1-6, 2-6
2026-07-16vs Fontenot/40/4.0/MD/BRECLost 12
L#1 DoublesKaty Almond / Nam Nguyen vs Natalie Anding / Sean Hall4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKelley Butler / Tom Crowell vs Donna Armentor / Jason Hawkins3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLisa Marie Raiford / Matt Dardenne vs Mandy LaCerte / Thomas Miglicco7-6, 6-2
2026-07-09vs Hattier/40/4.0/MD/BOCLost 12
W#1 DoublesLisa Marie Raiford / Justin Miller vs Suzanne Edmonson / Jason Doiron7-6, 7-6
L#2 DoublesKathryn Loveless / Tom Crowell vs Duke Minton / Ameeneh Langlois0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesHollie Easterling / Nam Nguyen vs Heather Jayson / Umut Meraler3-6, 6-7
2026-06-18vs Hamilton/40/4.0/MD/SOACLost 03
L#1 DoublesJustin Miller / Kathryn Loveless vs Travis Eiermann / Kimi Hart3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDanny Lai / Lisa Marie Raiford vs Kimberly Boria / Drew Hart6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNam Nguyen / Cherie Welch vs Chad Hamilton / Tracy Hamilton1-6, 3-6
2026-06-01vs Hamilton/40/4.0/MD/SOACLost 03
L#1 DoublesNam Nguyen / Lisa Marie Raiford vs Chad Hamilton / Tracy Hamilton1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKelley Butler / Tom Crowell vs Kimberly Boria / Drew Hart1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAndrew Muhl / Kathryn Loveless vs Kimi Hart / Stephen Politz3-6, 5-7
2026-05-28vs Hattier/40/4.0/MD/BOCWon 21
W#1 DoublesKathryn Loveless / Justin Miller vs Umut Meraler / Sylvia Sutton6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKelley Butler / Tom Crowell vs Michael Guillot / Shannon Hattier6-0, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLisa Marie Raiford / Nam Nguyen vs Suzanne Edmonson / Mike Williams3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-05-15vs Fontenot/40/4.0/MD/BRECLost 12
W#1 DoublesKathryn Loveless / Justin Miller vs Amy Twitchell / Jason Hawkins4-5
L#2 DoublesCherie Welch / Danny Lai vs Paula Baker / Donald Lund4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTara Comardelle / Nam Nguyen vs Rebecca Savoie / DEREK MICHELL6-7, 6-0, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 4.0 BR (40&O) Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hamilton/40/4.0/MD/SOAC8021312155
2Martin/40/4.0/MD/BREC6217718178
3Fontenot/40/4.0/MD/BREC44111333255
4Hattier/40/4.0/MD/BOC1761838259
5BUTLER/40/4.0/MD/BREC1751938255

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Cherie Welch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.74
Tara Comardelle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.68
Lisa Marie Raiford
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.58
Kathryn Loveless
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.55
Matt Dardenne
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.52
Danny Lai
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.46
Hollie Easterling
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.41
Tom Crowell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Andrew Muhl
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.36
Kelley Butler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Thomas Wafer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Katy Almond
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Thomas Wafer + Cherie Welch6072% games+12.7% vs expected
Kathryn Loveless + Thomas Wafer5164% games+5.7% vs expected
Tom Crowell + Kelley Butler1435% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cherie Welch
55W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.88
Tara Comardelle
36W–33L career · 1 line in 2026
3%95%2%
3.74
Lisa Marie Raiford
65W–88L career · 6 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.68
Kathryn Loveless
42W–39L career · 6 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.58
Matt Dardenne
28W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%35%65%
3.55
4
Danny Lai
57W–32L career · 4 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
3.52
3.5
Hollie Easterling
68W–36L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.46
Tom Crowell
64W–47L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Andrew Muhl
50W–43L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.41
Kelley Butler
16W–31L career · 4 lines in 2026
85%15%<1%
3.36
Thomas Wafer
102W–35L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.35
Katy Almond
33W–36L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
3.26

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.