Teams

MBJackson 8.0 CAP

2022 Cap Mixed 18 & over · 8.0 Mixed

8 players · average NTRP 4.70 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-25Won 10
W#2 DoublesAneesh Kodali / Megan Smith vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-07-18vs IACARROLLWon 20
W#2 DoublesTanita Tedamrongwanish / Matthew Bokulic vs Dale Lambe / Cybele Brockmann6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesZachary Dinkins / MaryBeth Jackson vs Trey Coomes / Helen Harris6-3, 7-6
2022-07-18vs AOdum/18+ 8.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesAneesh Kodali / Megan Smith vs Michelle Vedder / Aaron Vedder6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTanita Tedamrongwanish / Zachary Eulo vs Cody Vinson / Helen Strickland2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-07-11vs DJohn Mixed 8.0Won 20
W#2 DoublesHeather Remley / Benjamin Duong vs QUEEN HARGROVE / Jeffery Pettus6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesZachary Dinkins / MaryBeth Jackson vs Deno Fonville / Eric Emmanuel0-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-06-20vs JBricker18+Won 10
W#3 DoublesMaryBeth Jackson / Benjamin Duong vs Davis Humphries / Jennifer Bricker2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-06-14vs MThenLost 02
L#1 DoublesHeather Remley / Matthew Bokulic vs Hamilton Dickson / Emily Childs0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMaryBeth Jackson / Zachary Dinkins vs Meghan Zerkel / Stephen Holmes2-6, 4-6
2022-06-06vs Caprio/BaggettSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMegan Smith / Aneesh Kodali vs Sharon Baggett / Ted Sherburne6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesTanita Tedamrongwanish / Zachary Eulo vs Ashlie Adams / Jonathan Adams2-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.25 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.70
Tanita Tedamrongwanish
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 5
4.46
MaryBeth Jackson
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.42
Heather Remley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 5
4.34
Aneesh Kodali
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.25
Alex Renfrow
published 4.5
3.88
Spencer Johnson
published
3.68
Jill Akiyama
published
Zachary Dinkins
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tanita Tedamrongwanish + Aneesh Kodali9853% games+8.1% vs expected
MaryBeth Jackson + Aneesh Kodali314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Tanita Tedamrongwanish
179W–94L career · 8 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
4.70
4.5
MaryBeth Jackson
108W–57L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
4.46
5
Heather Remley
298W–155L career · 4 lines in 2022
73%27%<1%
4.42
4.5
Aneesh Kodali
119W–59L career · type A · 6 lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
4.34
4.5
Alex Renfrow
9W–3L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
4.25
Spencer Johnson
9W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.88
Jill Akiyama
7W–2L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.68
Zachary Dinkins
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.