Teams

KGilchrist (Queens)

2024 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over 6.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-09-20vs LJudd (Charlotte CC)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAmy Eades / Kristen Wester vs Laura Judd / Page Gatewood4-6, 5-7
2024-09-06vs BTobia (Brookhaven)Won 10
W#3 DoublesAmy Eades / Carter Stone vs Kate Merrill / Kara Horiatis6-2, 6-3
2024-08-30vs AMilas (OPRC)Won 10
W#3 DoublesKakie Cheek / Amy Eades vs Katie Monson / Christina Hill6-2, 6-1
2024-08-16vs KHeidkamp (PCC)Won 10
W#3 DoublesKathy Gilchrist / Amy Eades vs Anna Troppmann / Jenjer Robin6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Kristy Boyles
published
3.50
Ashley Hall
published 3.5
3.35
Amy Eades
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Kathy Gilchrist
published
3.24
Tara Cawthorne
published
3.00
Elizabeth Rust
published 3
2.93
Kakie Cheek
published
Carter Stone
published
Kasey Scannell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathy Gilchrist + Kristy Boyles6351% games+1.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristy Boyles
11W–12L career · no lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
3.51
3.5
Ashley Hall
31W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%50%50%
3.50
3.5
Amy Eades
46W–32L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
3.35
Kathy Gilchrist
15W–8L career · no lines in 2024
92%8%<1%
3.31
Tara Cawthorne
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.24
3
Elizabeth Rust
5W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.00
Kakie Cheek
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%28%
2.93
Carter Stone
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kasey Scannell
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.