Teams

PBurks (Life Time)

2022 Singles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Singles 4.0 Women - Mon PM

7 players · average NTRP 3.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-08-05vs KCantrell (Park Road)Won 10
W#3 SinglesCatalina Knutson vs Keri Cantrell6-3, 6-4
2022-08-01vs MGriffin (Queens)Lost 01
L#2 SinglesCatalina Knutson vs Kim Cochran0-6, 0-6
2022-07-29vs FBey (Jeff Adams)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesCatalina Knutson vs Julia Wilson3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-07-11Won 10
W#1 SinglesPamela Burks vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-06-06vs MParker (OPRC)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesCatalina Knutson vs Eryn Ratcliffe3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 4.0 Women - Mon PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Emily Weigel
published 4
4.00
Amy Redfield
published 4
3.65
Hila Johnson
published 4
3.58
Jennifer Lundberg
published
3.57
Pamela Burks
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.47
Catalina Knutson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.28
April Porter
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pamela Burks + Emily Weigel3349% games−0.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Emily Weigel
163W–81L career · no lines in 2022
<1%47%53%
4.01
4
Amy Redfield
71W–21L career · no lines in 2022
<1%51%49%
4.00
4
Hila Johnson
16W–16L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
Jennifer Lundberg
71W–77L career · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.58
Pamela Burks
207W–133L career · 1 line in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.57
3.5
Catalina Knutson
127W–129L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%60%40%
3.47
3.5
April Porter
2W–12L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.28

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.