← Teams

VTC-Grisham

2022 Mixed 18 & Over · 9.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 4.28 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Elijah Nelson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 5
—
Kaitlin Bos
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.24
Josh Schweitz
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.87
Christopher Perez
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.82
Halle Jackson
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 4
—
Kira Dennison Capen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Mary Klinger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.66
Jerilyn Hanson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.53
Jennifer Simmons
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Results8 ties
2021-12-03Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesJackie Dooris / Christopher Perez vs Sarah Ferrer / Nick Jarvis6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDyllan Fitzgerald / Halle Jackson vs Zhi George / Ian Paik6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesJosh Schweitz / Mary Klinger vs Elaine Apaza / Ke Ounaphom7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2021-11-14Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesTonya Dirk / Elijah Nelson vs Elaine Apaza / Christopher Evola6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMary Klinger / Brian Board vs JENNIFER BELOY / David Sturdyvin4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDyllan Fitzgerald / Jerilyn Hanson vs Sarah Ferrer / Ke Ounaphom5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2021-10-31Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesHalle Jackson / Josh Schweitz vs Steve Fogg / Lisa Gray6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesElijah Nelson / Jackie Dooris vs Raini Spitze / Brian Dehen7-6, 6-2
2021-10-30Won 2–0
W#2 DoublesAndrew Pritchard / Halle Jackson vs Divneet Kaur / Matt Simmering6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMary Klinger / Brian Board vs Kristin Taylor / Charles Taguet6-2, 6-0
2021-10-23Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesChristopher Perez / Kira Dennison Capen vs Stephen Robertson / Stephanie Paulson6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAndrew Pritchard / Jerilyn Hanson vs Tanya O'Neil / Mike Robertson6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesColt Tipton / Halle Jackson vs Allison Buchman / Craig Pearce7-6, 7-5
2021-10-17Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesJennifer Simmons / Brian Board vs Dongju Won / Seth Lee7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMary Klinger / Josh Schweitz vs James Luu / Sammy Bui6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKasi Muthu / Halle Jackson vs June Wu / Michael Yee6-4, 6-4
2021-10-09Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesAndrew Pritchard / Jennifer Simmons vs Minh Nguyen / Bronwen Hager6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBrian Board / Mary Klinger vs BON UNG / Amanda Jensen7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesChristopher Perez / Tonya Dirk vs Mike Mon / Hanna Jensen3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-09-12Won 2–0
W#2 DoublesKaitlin Bos / Carlos Andres Gomez Jimenez vs Minou Chau / Thomas McGirk6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKasi Muthu / Halle Jackson vs Minh Nguyen / Bronwen Hager7-6, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

5
Elijah Nelson
98W–31L career
not enough data
—
5
Kaitlin Bos
58W–41L career
not enough data
—
4.5
Josh Schweitz
58W–30L career
0%98%2%
4.24
4
Christopher Perez
48W–30L career
0%96%4%
3.87
4
Halle Jackson
123W–58L career
0%99%1%
3.82
4
Kira Dennison Capen
28W–40L career · type A
not enough data
—
4
Mary Klinger
221W–142L career
2%98%0%
3.70
4
Jerilyn Hanson
12W–27L career · type A
14%85%1%
3.66
4
Jennifer Simmons
63W–75L career
28%72%0%
3.53

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.