Teams

Wehmeyer/Memphis

2025 Adult 55 & Over-Memphis · 3.0 Women 55 & Over

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-27vs Drake/MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesPaula Coley / Camille Stump vs Ana Paula Pereira / Glaucia Novoa5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRenee DeGutis / Angela Wehmeyer vs Kim Pappas / Deborah Gentile2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCandi McMorran / Barbara Wilson vs Dana Kittleson / Laura Luckett1-6, 0-6
2025-04-16vs Monahan/MemphisLost 12
W#1 DoublesAngela Wehmeyer / Nancy Rose vs Cathy Poulin / Kathye Sbravati1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJennifer Sigan / Barbara Wilson vs Lisa Monahan / Lisa Evans4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCandi McMorran / Susan Patrone vs Tammy Downs / Becky Brady7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2025-03-23vs Monahan/MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesCamille Stump / Susan Patrone vs Letitia Phillips / Kathye Sbravati1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesRenee DeGutis / Paula Coley vs Lisa Evans / Cathy Poulin1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAngela Wehmeyer / Candi McMorran vs Amelia Blanton / Tammy Downs2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-03-16vs Drake/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesBarbara Wilson / Terry Bondurant vs Dana Guzzo / Andrea Harano2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAngela Wehmeyer / Jennifer Sigan vs Linda Fisher / Laura Luckett6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesRenee DeGutis / Candi McMorran vs Mary Sutton / Deborah Gentile2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.57 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.96
Nancy Rose
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Jennifer Sigan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.68
Paula Coley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.63
Camille Stump
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.52
Angela Wehmeyer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.44
Susan Patrone
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.37
Candi McMorran
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.35
Terry Bondurant
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.29
Renee DeGutis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Sigan + Nancy Rose213 matchesnot enough data
Paula Coley + Angela Wehmeyer123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nancy Rose
22W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%61%39%
2.96
Jennifer Sigan
19W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
Paula Coley
7W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Camille Stump
5W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
2.63
3
Angela Wehmeyer
4W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
2.52
Susan Patrone
18W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%65%35%
2.44
3
Candi McMorran
13W–36L career · 4 lines in 2025
83%17%<1%
2.37
Terry Bondurant
29W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
0%85%15%
2.35
Renee DeGutis
9W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%94%6%
2.29

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.