Teams

TOC.Brown

2022 CTRL Combo Doubles 18 & Over · Combo 18 & Over 8.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 4.43 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-10-02Won 20
W#2 DoublesParker Sheridan / Spencer Johnson vs Jonathan Chang / Everett Laborde6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesStephen Laroche / Philippe Adams vs Ben Freeman / Jack Burgess6-4, 6-4
2022-09-28Split 11
L#1 DoublesGaurav Luther / Parker Sheridan vs Andrew Belonga / Brandon Keisner2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKeith Overfield / Aneesh Kodali vs Wes Watson / Benjamin Albright7-6, 6-3
2022-09-11Won 10
W#3 DoublesPhilippe Adams / Daniel Segan vs David Chiu / Nick Zelano6-1, 6-2
2022-08-27vs TOC.MerckWon 10
W#3 DoublesStephen Laroche / Philippe Adams vs Dennis Coon / Scott Toman6-2, 6-2
2022-08-07Won 20
W#1 DoublesParker Sheridan / Patrick Shields vs Andreas Combos / Kevin Mcdonald6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKeith Overfield / Aneesh Kodali vs Ben Freeman / Everett Laborde6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo 18 & Over 8.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.19 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.49
Daniel Segan
published 4.5
4.43
Parker Sheridan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.34
Aneesh Kodali
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.25
Gaurav Luther
published 4.5
4.21
Casey Black
published 4.5
4.21
Patrick Shields
published
4.17
Stephen Laroche
published
4.05
Brennan Doran
published 4.5
3.88
Spencer Johnson
published
3.83
Philippe Adams
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aneesh Kodali + Parker Sheridan404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Daniel Segan
5W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%53%47%
4.49
4.5
Parker Sheridan
202W–65L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
4.43
4.5
Aneesh Kodali
119W–59L career · type A · 5 lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
4.34
4.5
Gaurav Luther
4W–1L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Casey Black
24W–11L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
4.21
Patrick Shields
43W–14L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
4.21
Stephen Laroche
16W–9L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
4.17
4.5
Brennan Doran
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
4.05
Spencer Johnson
9W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Philippe Adams
81W–74L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.83

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.