Teams

Douchard

2025 Adult 18 & Over-SW · Women 2.5

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-24vs Lowery TeamLost 12
W#1 DoublesAndrea Barry / Brandi Leggett vs Darby Freeman / Adrienne Douglas6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMailey Kate Young vs Ashlyn Gatlin6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJessica Killen / Taylor Middleton vs Lindy Sills / Shelby Powell3-6, 5-7
2025-04-03vs Lowery TeamLost 03
L#1 DoublesAndrea Barry / Mailey Kate Young vs Ashlyn Gatlin / Layne Xifos6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesTaylor Middleton vs Darby Freeman5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJessica Killen / Stacey Lambert vs Tesa Duckworth / Shelby Powell1-6, 2-6
2025-03-30vs Lowery TeamWon 21
W#1 DoublesBrandi Leggett / Rebecca Carter vs Lindy Sills / Ashlyn Gatlin6-0, 6-2
L#1 SinglesMailey Kate Young vs Adrienne Douglas4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesJessica Killen / Andrea Barry vs Shelby Powell / Kelly Fenwick6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2025-03-27vs Lowery TeamLost 03
L#1 DoublesAndrea Barry / Brandi Leggett vs Adrienne Douglas / Layne Xifos3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMailey Kate Young vs Ashlyn Gatlin5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJessica Killen / Stacey Lambert vs JENNA NELSON / Tesa Duckworth1-6, 1-6
2025-03-20vs Lowery TeamWon 20
W#1 DoublesAndrea Barry / Brandi Leggett vs Darby Freeman / JENNA NELSON6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJessica Killen / Taylor Middleton vs Kelly Fenwick / Ashlyn Gatlin6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2025-02-27vs Lowery TeamLost 12
W#1 DoublesBrandi Leggett / Rebecca Carter vs Tesa Duckworth / Darby Freeman6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesStacy Douchard vs Layne Xifos3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTaylor Middleton / Mailey Kate Young vs Lindy Sills / Adrienne Douglas5-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.59 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.67
Brandi Leggett
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.51
Taylor Middleton
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Jessica Killen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mailey Kate Young
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Stacey Lambert
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Stacy Douchard
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacy Douchard + Stacey Lambert213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Brandi Leggett
27W–6L career · 8 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.67
Taylor Middleton
8W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
2.51
Jessica Killen
2W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mailey Kate Young
2W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stacey Lambert
4W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stacy Douchard
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.