Teams

Provo High School-Page

2022 Fall Indoor League-Weekday · 3.0W

15 players · average NTRP 3.35 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-12-14vs Sports Mall-GriffithsWon 30
W#1 Female DoublesLanie Wilkinson / Angela Woods vs Evangelina Malouf / Jennifer Faddis6-1, 6-2
W#1 Female SinglesMelissa Pennock vs Penny Gambill6-3, 3-1
W#2 Female DoublesLisa Michie / Molly Call vs Hege Farnsworth / LaRae Dean7-5, 0-1, 1-0
2022-12-07vs Sunpro-Belliston/AndersonSplit 11
L#1 Female DoublesElizabeth Lohner / Maria Call vs Gina Anderson / Raquel Moss6-7, 0-1
W#2 Female DoublesLanie Wilkinson / Lisa Michie vs LaRicia Belliston / Cherylin Winkel6-2, 6-3
2022-11-30Lost 02
L#1 Female DoublesKelli Lowell / Maria Call vs Rebekah Aubrey / Esther Rowland4-6, 4-3, 0-1
L#2 Female DoublesMarty Evans / Melissa Pennock vs Becky Nelson / Tiffany Riley2-6, 4-5
2022-11-16vs Red Ledges-Overton/WoodWon 20
W#1 Female DoublesLisa Michie / Angela Woods vs Jen Dagley / Megan Overton2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 Female DoublesElizabeth Lohner / Maria Call vs Giuliana Willis / Carrie Topp6-3, 4-3
2022-11-09vs Sports Mall-Majors/JensenLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesElizabeth Lohner / Jordan Osborne vs Julie Black / Amber Thompson1-6, 2-6
2022-11-02Split 11
W#1 Female DoublesLisa Michie / Angela Woods vs Diane Poole / Sarah Law6-4, 3-1
L#2 Female DoublesKelli Lowell / Molly Call vs Anna Pearce / Caryl Fletcher0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings15 teams · 3.0W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ace Athletics-Bastian5119511139
2Sports Mall-Majors/Jensen5118613140
3Sports Mall-Shoff/Stebbing5118614139
4Park City MARC-Byrne5117717157
5Ivory Ridge-McCord/Wily5116819164
6Sunpro-Belliston/Anderson4215921184
7Ogden-Cox/Johnstun42131124179
8Sports Mall-Lyon/George33131125191
9Provo High School-Page33121228200
10Red Ledges-Overton/Wood33131128196
11Cottonwood Club-Wolfgram/Winson33111328197
12Sunpro-Donaldson/Cardall1571736228
13Sports Mall-Griffiths1561837221
14RISE AC-Orme1561838234
15Wasatch Rec Center-Davis/McBride0651940255

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Ashlee Chappell
published 3.5
3.33
Melissa Pennock
usually #2 Female Doubles 50%, also #1 Female Singles 50% · published 3.5
Angela Woods
published 3.5
3.22
Lisa Michie
usually #1 Female Doubles 50%, also #2 Female Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.21
Amy Teemant
published 3.5
3.21
Kelli Lowell
usually #2 Female Doubles 50%, also #1 Female Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.12
Lanie Wilkinson
usually #2 Female Doubles 50%, also #1 Female Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.00
Elizabeth Lohner
usually #1 Female Doubles 67%, also #3 Female Doubles 33% · published 3
3.00
Jordan Osborne
published
2.89
Lisa Hart
published
2.76
Abby Waldrip
published 3
Amie Page
published 3
Maria Call
published
Marty Evans
published
Molly Call
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jordan Osborne + Maria Call3258% games+17.2% vs expected
Kelli Lowell + Ashlee Chappell6067% games+13.7% vs expected
Elizabeth Lohner + Ashlee Chappell6161% games+13.6% vs expected
Melissa Pennock + Elizabeth Lohner7353% games+12.0% vs expected
Lisa Hart + Kelli Lowell8163% games+11.7% vs expected
Lanie Wilkinson + Lisa Michie13757% games+11.6% vs expected
Amy Teemant + Ashlee Chappell8268% games+9.4% vs expected
Melissa Pennock + Lisa Hart3259% games+9.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ashlee Chappell
89W–30L career · no lines in 2022
<1%17%83%
3.63
3.5
Melissa Pennock
131W–41L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.33
3.5
Angela Woods
33W–28L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Lisa Michie
96W–64L career · 4 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.22
3.5
Amy Teemant
69W–36L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Kelli Lowell
100W–63L career · 2 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Lanie Wilkinson
75W–52L career · 2 lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
3
Elizabeth Lohner
64W–78L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%51%49%
3.00
Jordan Osborne
45W–95L career · no lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
3.00
Lisa Hart
55W–71L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Abby Waldrip
16W–45L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Amie Page
30W–48L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Maria Call
27W–29L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Marty Evans
36W–45L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Molly Call
21W–32L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.