← Teams

Bl.Leippe40S

2023 Cap 40 & Over Singles League · 3.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-07-23Lost 0–2
L#2 SinglesJulie Newson vs Carolina Robayo1-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesJennifer Wolborsky vs Griffin Lamb1-6, 0-6
2023-07-16vs Sh.Leaver40SLost 0–1
L#2 SinglesJulie Newson vs Teresa Rullman3-6, 4-6
2023-07-02Lost 0–1
L#2 SinglesJacqueline Wolborsky vs Ashley McCollum1-6, 4-6
2023-06-25Won 1–0
W#1 SinglesJacqueline Wolborsky vs Gillian Kelleher6-0, 6-2
2023-06-04Lost 0–1
L#2 SinglesJulie Newson vs Lisa Kempf2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Heather Bilderback
published 3.5
3.20
Jacqueline Wolborsky
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
2.99
2.98
Julie Newson
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.90
Jennifer Wolborsky
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.88
Heather Hofmann
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jacqueline Wolborsky + Jennifer Wolborsky1–34 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Heather Bilderback
127W–65L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Jacqueline Wolborsky
66W–46L career · 2 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
3
Jacqueline Morgan
23W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
Julie Newson
70W–78L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Jennifer Wolborsky
172W–237L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
Heather Hofmann
7W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
2.88

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.