Teams

LCRU-Rupp/Corn Rd Pk

2025 Lake USTA 55 & Over League · Women 3.5

5 players · average NTRP 3.12 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-03vs LMLA-Laliberte/LNRCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPam Britt / Cheryl McCrorey vs Tina Riedell / Bonnie Chen0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLawren Wells / Sara Griffith vs Mary Laliberte / Christin Darnell6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2025-04-26vs LCRO-Rorech/CSD SPARTANSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLawren Wells / Sara Griffith vs Nancy Williams / Ursula Kleimeier3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKatherine Karnatz / Amy Lawton vs Charlotte Rorech / Kathy Dunlap6-2, 6-4
2025-04-19vs LJCU-Cunningham/RR 55+ 3.5Split 11
L#1 DoublesLawren Wells / Sara Griffith vs Joanne Cunningham / Beth Schleck6-1, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKatherine Karnatz / Amy Lawton vs Tracy Keill / Susan Sanders6-3, 6-2
2025-04-12vs LKWI-Williams/SCLost 02
L#1 DoublesRobin Noud / Pam Britt vs Anne Clark / Karla Williams1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSara Griffith / Lawren Wells vs Myra Kruger / Angie Hartsell1-6, 5-7
2025-03-29vs LMLA-Laliberte/LNRCLost 02
L#1 DoublesCheryl McCrorey / Pam Britt vs Janice Ingram / Anna Bonham0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLawren Wells / Sara Griffith vs Karime Jankauskas / Jan Wildman0-6, 5-7
2025-03-22vs LCRO-Rorech/CSD SPARTANWon 10
W#2 DoublesKatherine Karnatz / Amy Lawton vs Janet Nixon / Julia Mueller7-5, 7-5
2025-03-15vs LJCU-Cunningham/RR 55+ 3.5Won 20
W#2 DoublesLawren Wells / Katherine Karnatz vs Susan Sanders / Tracy Keill5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRobin Noud / Pam Britt vs Barbara Kucharski / Cathie Loveless6-4, 6-3
2025-03-08vs LKWI-Williams/SCLost 02
L#1 DoublesRobin Noud / Katherine Karnatz vs Sharon Miller / Teresa Pal2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Lawton / Pam Britt vs Kelley Montroy / Cindy Houser3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Lawren Wells
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.07
Katherine Karnatz
usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #2 Doubles 42% · published 3.5
2.79
Pam Britt
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.73
Amy Lawton
published 3
Robin Noud
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pam Britt + Lawren Wells4358% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Lawren Wells
175W–71L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.15
3.5
Katherine Karnatz
190W–171L career · 12 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
3
Pam Britt
111W–102L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Amy Lawton
7W–16L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Robin Noud
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.