Teams

GSCC

2022 CTA WOMEN'S 2.5 - ASPEN · MOUNTAINS

4 players · average NTRP / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-08vs BASALT BLACKLost 12
L#1 DoublesLisa Palmer / Kelly Zevin vs Megan Vrono / Richlyn Pavcek7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLynsey Pulliam vs Cynthia Helm6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesKristin Davis / Margo Stapleton vs Wendy Hayden / Dena Albright1-6, 1-6
2022-08-01vs BASALT BLACKWon 21
L#1 DoublesJon Nell Reeds / Kelly Zevin vs Richlyn Pavcek / Megan Vrono5-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesLynsey Pulliam vs Wendy Hayden6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMargo Stapleton / Lisa Palmer vs Dena Albright / Jana Sulzer6-4, 6-1
2022-07-25vs BASALT BLACKSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJon Nell Reeds / Lynsey Pulliam vs Wendy Hayden / Cynthia Helm7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKelly Zevin vs Megan Vrono1-6, 5-7
2022-07-18vs BASALT BLACKLost 02
L#1 DoublesJon Nell Reeds / Lisa Palmer vs Megan Vrono / Cynthia Helm1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMargo Stapleton / Julie Kaufman vs Dena Albright / Suzanne Wheeler-Del Piccolo4-6, 0-6
2022-07-11vs BASALT BLACKLost 03
L#1 DoublesKristin Davis / Jon Nell Reeds vs Richlyn Pavcek / Megan Vrono5-5
L#1 SinglesKelly Zevin vs Wendy Hayden2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMargo Stapleton / Lisa Palmer vs Dena Albright / Melissa Knight4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-06-27vs BASALT BLACKSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLynsey Pulliam / Kelly Zevin vs Richlyn Pavcek / Wendy Hayden4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMargo Stapleton / Julie Kaufman vs Cynthia Helm / Megan Vrono2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MOUNTAINS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.79
Lynsey Pulliam
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.65
Kelly Zevin
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
Jon Nell Reeds
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Margo Stapleton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Margo Stapleton + Jon Nell Reeds303 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Zevin + Jon Nell Reeds123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lynsey Pulliam
43W–45L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.79
Kelly Zevin
22W–33L career · 5 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
2.65
Jon Nell Reeds
28W–12L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Margo Stapleton
12W–18L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.