Teams

GALVIN PK CM8.5A

2025 COMBO · Men 8.5

14 players · average NTRP 4.25 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-10-19vs BELVEDERE TC CM8.5ALost 12
W#1 DoublesJohn Taylor / Michael Saucy vs Bennett Gazor / Keith Lister6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesEvan Vercellini / Scott Dunaway vs Perry Peirano / Julian Monatlik2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAngelo Purugganan / Mauricio Rodriguezramirez vs Daniel Mathis / Brendan Kuhlman2-6, 4-6
2025-10-11vs FLYTE RC CM8.5AWon 21
L#1 DoublesMigue Andrade-Marin / Philip Stepanek vs Geoffrey Gerding / Lawrence Coburn2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesScott Dunaway / Michael Saucy vs Olivier Picault / Elliot Diamond6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesCody Otero / Angelo Purugganan vs Peter Lowden / Caben Chester6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.89 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.33
Michael Saucy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.29
Evan Vercellini
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.07
Peter Magrini
published 4
4.05
Angelo Purugganan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.94
Cody Otero
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.86
Luke Kenning
published
3.78
Kenji Kumasaka
published
3.73
Migue Andrade-Marin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Mauricio Rodriguezramirez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Philip Stepanek
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Minh Ta
published
Jonathan Chinn
published
Ken Westly
published
Scott Dunaway
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kenji Kumasaka + Mauricio Rodriguezramirez213 matchesnot enough data
Kenji Kumasaka + Cody Otero303 matchesnot enough data
Cody Otero + Luke Kenning213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Saucy
11W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
4.33
4.5
Evan Vercellini
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
1%94%5%
4.29
4
Peter Magrini
67W–25L career · no lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
4.07
4.5
Angelo Purugganan
5W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
4.05
4
Cody Otero
7W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.94
Luke Kenning
6W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.86
Kenji Kumasaka
19W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.78
Migue Andrade-Marin
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
Mauricio Rodriguezramirez
5W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
5%94%2%
3.72
Philip Stepanek
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
Minh Ta
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
96%4%<1%
3.28
Jonathan Chinn
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ken Westly
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Scott Dunaway
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.