Teams

1-KHoekstra-HR

Tri-Level 55 & Over · 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.42 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-28vs 3-NDraughon-YMCA-55Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMary Fortin / Brynn Hale vs Diane Adams / Tammy Bradley1-6, 2-6
2023-06-28vs 2-Mlong-Eno-55Tri-LevelWon 30
W#1 DoublesMary Tusing / Beth Loeb vs Stacy Brehm / Caroline Patzer6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKateri Hoekstra / Mary Fortin vs Beverly Fedewa / Beth Clark7-5, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMartha Schulwitz / Judy Croan vs Marlene Spurr / Judith Hagopian-Edwards6-1, 6-2
2023-06-19vs 3-NDraughon-YMCA-55Lost 01
L#3 DoublesRebecca Georgi / Judy Croan vs Patricia Carroll / Bailey Cook4-6, 2-6
2023-06-16vs 3-NDraughon-YMCA-55Lost 01
L#3 DoublesCindy Rossitch / Judy Croan vs Dina Golden / Caryl Schwartzbach4-6, 2-6
2023-06-02vs 2-Mlong-Eno-55Tri-LevelWon 21
W#1 DoublesMelissa Lutz / Beth Loeb vs Donna Holtaway / Caroline Patzer6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMary Fortin / Cynthia Sundy vs Bracha Blanc / Beverly Fedewa6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMartha Schulwitz / Judy Croan vs Mary T Long / Cecilia Edgar4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-05-26vs 2-Mlong-Eno-55Tri-LevelWon 10
W#1 DoublesMary Tusing / Beth Loeb vs Caroline Patzer / Stacy Brehm6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Mary Tusing
published
3.65
Melissa Lutz
published
3.59
Nancee Merritt
published
3.53
Beth Loeb
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.28
Brynn Hale
published 3.5
3.20
Cynthia Sundy
published 3.5
3.10
Mary Fortin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.89
Cindy Rossitch
published 3
2.89
Judy Croan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.81
Rebecca Georgi
published
Darlene Williams
published
Kateri Hoekstra
published
Martha Schulwitz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Lutz + Nancee Merritt8749% games−2.6% vs expected
Brynn Hale + Cynthia Sundy134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Tusing
25W–26L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
Melissa Lutz
23W–17L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.65
Nancee Merritt
16W–16L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.59
4
Beth Loeb
124W–158L career · 3 lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.53
3.5
Brynn Hale
7W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Cynthia Sundy
11W–16L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Mary Fortin
113W–105L career · 3 lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.10
3
Cindy Rossitch
13W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Judy Croan
49W–54L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
2.89
Rebecca Georgi
12W–16L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
2.81
Darlene Williams
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kateri Hoekstra
8W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Martha Schulwitz
3W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.