Teams

LWFairer/NMP 7.5

2022 Lake Combo Doubles 40 & Over · Women 7.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-10-10vs LPATE-NMPLost 01
L#2 DoublesLeenee Roberge / Lisa Alexander vs LuAnne Pate / Christine Hardin4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-10-03vs LKFinke/NMP Combo 40+Split 11
W#1 DoublesLeenee Roberge / Michelle Potuzak vs Kathryn Burdick / Mollie Lynch6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLia Smith / Lori Gougeon vs Sheryl Beaver / Angela Benson4-6, 2-6
2022-09-26vs LJRO-Rodewald/SkybrookLost 01
L#3 DoublesKristen Nardone / Michelle Potuzak vs Lori Fuller / Patricia Baldelli7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2022-09-19vs LJHiggins/NMPSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLeenee Roberge / Cristen Morgan vs Jennifer Higgins / Anna Bonham2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLori Gougeon / Lia Smith vs Katie McCrossen / Julie Yencer2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-09-17vs LPATE-NMPWon 10
W#3 DoublesSherry Hart / Michelle Potuzak vs Hasina Davidson / Karen Dziadziola0-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-08-29vs LKFinke/NMP Combo 40+Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKristen Nardone / Lia Smith vs Angie Hartsell / Margaret Vermillion2-6, 1-6
2022-08-28vs LJHiggins/NMPWon 10
W#3 DoublesMichelle Potuzak / Terri Merklein vs Ursula Kleimeier / Stacy Foshee3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-08-22vs LJRO-Rodewald/SkybrookSplit 11
L#2 DoublesMichelle Potuzak / Wendy Fairer vs Mary Hamilton Chiles / Lisa Squatriglia4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesCristen Morgan / Lia Smith vs Patricia Baldelli / Lori Fuller6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Michelle Potuzak
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.48
Megan Hartley
published
3.16
Lia Smith
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.15
Leenee Roberge
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.98
Christine Hairston
published 3.5
2.82
Terri Merklein
published
2.75
Kristen Nardone
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.64
Wendy Fairer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lia Smith + Leenee Roberge1833% gamesnot enough data
Kristen Nardone + Leenee Roberge134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Michelle Potuzak
150W–116L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.87
Megan Hartley
17W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%55%44%
3.48
3.5
Lia Smith
67W–88L career · 7 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Leenee Roberge
50W–92L career · 6 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Christine Hairston
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
2.98
Terri Merklein
7W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Kristen Nardone
46W–76L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%95%3%
2.75
Wendy Fairer
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
2.64

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.