Teams

CRRC Mixed Silver Smashers

2025 55&over Mixed · 7.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.43 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-22vs RRC DOUBLES OR NOTHINGLost 02
L#1 DoublesRobert Greenstein / Cindy Greenstein vs Glen Sansone / Karen Moriarty6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPhillip Raclyn / Regina Allegretti-Davenport vs Susan Nask / Yong Gao3-6, 4-6
2025-03-16vs TCH: Mixed NutsLost 03
L#1 DoublesNatalie Gorlin / Scott Hodgson vs Christine Burns / Richard Cohen6-2, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesFrances Kellner / RICHARD McSPEDON vs Jennifer Albanese / Gil Feder1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRegina Allegretti-Davenport / Phillip Raclyn vs Donna Kalin / Evan Kalin4-6, 4-6
2025-03-09vs RRC DOUBLES OR NOTHINGWon 21
W#1 DoublesGregg Gelman / Nurit Praeger vs Susan Nask / Justo Reyes5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRobert Greenstein / Cindy Greenstein vs Glen Sansone / Daniela Sansone7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLarry Karp / Liz SusmanKarp vs JJ Lipuma / Michiyo Terakado3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-03-02vs Club Fit JV - Couples TherapyLost 03
L#1 DoublesCindy Greenstein / Robert Greenstein vs Jiarui Wang / Catherine Cousin2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMark Eickelbeck / Caroline Eickelbeck vs Carl Thorsberg / Lynne Welling6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesNurit Praeger / Phillip Raclyn vs Richard Segal / Joanna Segal6-7, 4-6
2025-02-23vs TCH: Mixed NutsWon 21
L#1 DoublesWilliam Graham / Karen Graham vs Christine Burns / Ryan Pence1-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesCindy Greenstein / Robert Greenstein vs Clarel Antoine / Deborah Antoine6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLarry Karp / Liz SusmanKarp vs Donna Kalin / Evan Kalin6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-02-02vs Club Fit JV - Couples TherapyLost 03
L#1 DoublesScott Hodgson / Natalie Gorlin vs Jiarui Wang / Anita Lohrs2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesWilliam Graham / Karen Graham vs John Leary / Elizabeth Leary4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCaroline Eickelbeck / Mark Eickelbeck vs Tim Sullivan / Yvette Bayoumy2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RRC DOUBLES OR NOTHING0611716154
2Club Fit JV - Couples Therapy0611717150
3TCH: Mixed Nuts0610819152
4CRRC Mixed Silver Smashers0641431204

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Karen Graham
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.35
Nurit Praeger
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.32
Cindy Greenstein
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.29
Scott Hodgson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Liz SusmanKarp
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
William Graham
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.17
Gregg Gelman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Mark Eickelbeck
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.08
Natalie Gorlin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
RICHARD McSPEDON
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Robert Greenstein
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.76
Regina Allegretti-Davenport
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.75
Phillip Raclyn
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.74
Caroline Eickelbeck
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.59
Frances Kellner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Larry Karp
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Liz SusmanKarp + Larry Karp5449% games+11.8% vs expected
Cindy Greenstein + Robert Greenstein1940% games−13.1% vs expected
Karen Graham + William Graham2541% gamesnot enough data
Frances Kellner + Robert Greenstein314 matchesnot enough data
Caroline Eickelbeck + Mark Eickelbeck044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Karen Graham
77W–110L career · 2 lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
3.44
Nurit Praeger
71W–99L career · 2 lines in 2025
88%12%<1%
3.35
3.5
Cindy Greenstein
116W–99L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
Scott Hodgson
50W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Liz SusmanKarp
139W–109L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
William Graham
30W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%5%95%
3.21
3.5
Gregg Gelman
38W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
10%90%1%
3.17
Mark Eickelbeck
35W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Natalie Gorlin
61W–68L career · 2 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.08
RICHARD McSPEDON
41W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.02
Robert Greenstein
41W–38L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.97
Regina Allegretti-Davenport
71W–44L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
2.76
Phillip Raclyn
76W–105L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%95%2%
2.75
3
Caroline Eickelbeck
62W–49L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Frances Kellner
92W–90L career · 1 line in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.59
Larry Karp
33W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.