Teams

HW NAVY

2022 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT

12 players · average NTRP 3.22 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-09-07vs SSH YELLOWLost 12
L#1 DoublesBrittany Norris / Melissa Long vs Kirsten Mau / Jennifer David6-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesKiki Faircloth vs Tina Burton4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKaren Hopkinson / Kristin Martini vs Brooke Fox / Erin Herman2-6, 4-6
2022-08-31vs SSLT PURPLEWon 30
W#1 DoublesKarlie Boone / Kiki Faircloth vs Sara Percival / Beth Reedy7-6, 6-4
W#1 SinglesHolly Schoolcraft vs Alyssa Jenson6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMelissa Gilkison / Kristin Martini vs Amy Koldyke / Rachel Austin3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-08-24vs WC WHITESplit 11
L#1 DoublesMorgan Walton / Melissa Long vs Becca Rinn / Kathryn Cullen0-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesKarlie Boone / Eli Boone vs Melissa Cabeceiras / Jenny Yotter6-2, 6-3
2022-08-17vs PRC GREENLost 03
L#1 DoublesMelissa Gilkison / Kiki Faircloth vs Jennifer Meissner / Emily Carter2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMorgan Walton vs Kelli Swan6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBrittany Norris / Kelly Lewis vs Lori Lee / Amber Harris1-6, 3-6
2022-08-10vs CCV YELLOWLost 12
L#1 DoublesBrittany Norris / Eli Boone vs Patricia Colella / Laura L Marturano3-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesMelissa Long vs Christy Battaglia2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKristin Martini / Kelly Lewis vs Kirsten Despain / Karen Bielenberg1-6, 0-6
2022-08-03vs SSH YELLOWWon 21
W#1 DoublesKristen Scarbrough / Morgan Walton vs Erin Herman / Tina Burton3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMelissa Gilkison vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesBrittany Norris / Kelly Lewis vs Kirsten Mau / Jill Arnold3-6, 1-6
2022-07-27vs SSLT PURPLEWon 21
W#1 DoublesHolly Schoolcraft / Karlie Boone vs Beth Reedy / Carolyn Bettner6-0, 6-4
W#1 SinglesEli Boone vs Sara Percival6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesKristen Scarbrough / Karen Hopkinson vs Sheila Marino / Kathleen Crockett6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings19 teams · WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SSG YELLOW7017410117
2LTA GOLD6116513153
3MVCC GOLD6116516152
4KC AQUA5214717161
5CCV YELLOW5213818161
6SKY GOLD5213818170
7RHCC YELLOW4210818158
8BCC GREEN4312919176
9KNO PURPLE4312922184
10CK GOLD43111023195
11VC RED4312924208
12HW NAVY43111024198
13GPTC NAVY43101127221
14GR BLACK34101124200
15PCC GREEN3491227204
16EM PINK2591226198
17GAC NAVY2581327198
18GTC ORANGE2581329208
19HG YELLOW0751633214

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Kiki Faircloth
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Morgan Walton
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Holly Schoolcraft
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.08
Karen Hopkinson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.07
Eli Boone
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.03
Brittany Norris
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.86
Melissa Long
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.79
Melissa Gilkison
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.75
Karlie Boone
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.65
Kelly Lewis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.60
Kristin Martini
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Kristen Scarbrough
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karlie Boone + Brittany Norris4157% games+13.6% vs expected
Brittany Norris + Kiki Faircloth6262% games+12.0% vs expected
Karlie Boone + Eli Boone6160% games+12.0% vs expected
Eli Boone + Kiki Faircloth6359% games+5.1% vs expected
Morgan Walton + Holly Schoolcraft23658% games+4.7% vs expected
Eli Boone + Brittany Norris1546% games+1.5% vs expected
Kelly Lewis + Melissa Long4349% games+0.1% vs expected
Kelly Lewis + Brittany Norris2339% games−3.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kiki Faircloth
42W–19L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Morgan Walton
42W–16L career · 3 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Holly Schoolcraft
42W–13L career · type A · 2 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.13
3
Karen Hopkinson
39W–28L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%26%74%
3.08
3
Eli Boone
36W–39L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%30%70%
3.07
3.5
Brittany Norris
25W–25L career · 4 lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
3.03
Melissa Long
27W–23L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
2.86
3
Melissa Gilkison
42W–52L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Karlie Boone
31W–30L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
Kelly Lewis
13W–29L career · 3 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
2.65
3
Kristin Martini
20W–37L career · 3 lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
2.60
Kristen Scarbrough
5W–12L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.