Teams

5FAC-ROSS 85 MEN COMBO SEM F1

2022 SEM FALL COMBO DOUBLES · MEN 85 COMBO SEM

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / S.E. MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-12-10vs 4BEV-UHLAR 85 MEN COMBO SEM F1Lost 02
L#2 DoublesRobert Cupples / David Tobin vs Shawn Snell / Tom Aubrey1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTimothy Ross / Jose Arriaga vs Miles Uhlar / Matthew Kaminski3-6, 0-6
2022-11-19vs 3SCWB-KUROSAWA 85 MEN COMBO SEM F1Lost 03
L#1 DoublesRyan Sankovic / Brandon Mazzola vs Matthew Raftis / Daniel Kinsley5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDale Gardner / Jose Arriaga vs Yasuhiro Okura / Koya Hasegawa2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Tobin / Robert Cupples vs Tsuyoshi Kurosawa / Shuntaro Tsukiyama2-6, 2-6
2022-11-05vs 2CHIP-LANG 85 MEN COMBO SEM F1Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDale Gardner / Austin Lentz vs Matthew Stetson / Jared Bentley1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJose Arriaga / Richard Allison vs Kip Andringa / Adam DiMaggio0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Tobin / Jason Wysocki vs James Lang / Eric Shaw6-1, 1-6, 0-1
2022-10-28vs 4BEV-UHLAR 85 MEN COMBO SEM F1Lost 02
L#1 DoublesRyan Sankovic / Brandon Mazzola vs Brian Wayne / Allan Zamierowski4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesAustin Lentz / Steven Kalt vs Tom Aubrey / Matthew Kaminski0-6, 2-6
2022-10-16vs 3SCWB-KUROSAWA 85 MEN COMBO SEM F1Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJoseph Dembowski / Austin Lentz vs Daniel Kinsley / Jingkang Wang4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Tobin / Robert Cupples vs Narihiro Agusa / Yasuhiro Okura1-6, 3-6
2022-10-08vs 1CHIP-ALEKSEEV 85 MEN COMBO SEM F1Lost 12
W#1 DoublesRyan Sankovic / Alexander Demick vs Anthony Smith / Frederick Smith7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAustin Lentz / Joseph Dembowski vs Michael Funk / James Douglass5-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesDale Gardner / Robert Cupples vs Carlton Lartigue / Terry Bowman4-6, 4-6
2022-10-01vs 2CHIP-LANG 85 MEN COMBO SEM F1Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDavid Tobin / Jason Wysocki vs Matthew Stetson / Adam DiMaggio0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRobert Cupples / Austin Lentz vs Paul Gill / Michael Reyes3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTimothy Ross / Joseph Dembowski vs Sean Howard / Jonathan Bowdler0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · MEN 85 COMBO SEM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
14BEV-UHLAR 85 MEN COMBO SEM F17119514172
23EAST-KEAN 85 MEN COMBO SEM F26116513161
33SCWB-KUROSAWA 85 MEN COMBO SEM F16218615191
42CHIP-LANG 85 MEN COMBO SEM F15316819169
56DEER-KERIN 85 MEN COMBO SEM F24313819178
65BLOOM-MANEPALLI 85 MEN COMBO SEM F2316615121
72LTF-SZYMANSKI 85 MEN COMBO SEM F22571428201
84EAST-WARNER 85 MEN COMBO SEM F21661532219
91CHIP-ALEKSEEV 85 MEN COMBO SEM F11631837245
10drop 9.6 0P 756044 deer lake-unknown 85 MEN000000
11drop 9.6 0P 756045 MONY-ESCHECK 85 MEN000000
125FAC-ROSS 85 MEN COMBO SEM F10712041251

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Alexander Demick
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.86
Joseph Dembowski
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.86
Inbum Song
published 4.5
Austin Lentz
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.63
Dale Gardner
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.53
Brandon Mazzola
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.46
Robert Cupples
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.41
Timothy Ross
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jason Wysocki
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Jose Arriaga
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Richard Allison
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Ryan Sankovic
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brandon Mazzola + Dale Gardner3452% games+10.7% vs expected
Ryan Sankovic + Brandon Mazzola8256% games+6.1% vs expected
Robert Cupples + Timothy Ross1932% games−4.5% vs expected
Robert Cupples + Brandon Mazzola224 matchesnot enough data
Robert Cupples + Austin Lentz044 matchesnot enough data
Dale Gardner + Austin Lentz134 matchesnot enough data
Dale Gardner + Timothy Ross224 matchesnot enough data
Robert Cupples + Jason Wysocki033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alexander Demick
61W–18L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%55%45%
3.98
4
Joseph Dembowski
43W–51L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
3.86
4.5
Inbum Song
18W–38L career · no lines in 2022
86%14%<1%
3.86
4
Austin Lentz
9W–50L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Dale Gardner
66W–51L career · 7 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.63
4
Brandon Mazzola
33W–27L career · 2 lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.53
3.5
Robert Cupples
148W–197L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
3.46
Timothy Ross
25W–84L career · 2 lines in 2022
>99%<1%0%
3.41
Jason Wysocki
6W–20L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jose Arriaga
17W–17L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Richard Allison
2W–10L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Ryan Sankovic
37W–28L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.