Teams

Greenhill/Saqueton M Open

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 40 & Over ADULT M Saturday · M Open

11 players · average NTRP 4.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
L#1 DoublesChris Hill / Kenny Austin vs Robert Novotny / Byron Talbot3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesRaman Zhvirblia vs Rafael Valdez2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDan Cummins / Akos Osvath vs Peter Hancy / STEPHAN PEISER3-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesKenny Austin / Justin Huffman vs Byron Talbot / Robert Novotny2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAkos Osvath vs Loren Collins1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRaman Zhvirblia / Michael Carey vs Rafael Valdez / Brannon Perkison4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesRaman Zhvirblia vs Scott Eddins2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAkos Osvath / Scott Pope vs Byron Talbot / Robert Novotny4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for M Open have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.22 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Akos Osvath
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.29
Rama Goud
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.26
Peter Paulsen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Christopher Cheng
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Dan Cummins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.14
Wil Saqueton
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
4.07
Justin Huffman
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published
Jeffrey Babb
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kenny Austin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Raman Zhvirblia
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Scott Pope
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kenny Austin + Wil Saqueton224 matchesnot enough data
Justin Huffman + Wil Saqueton134 matchesnot enough data
Kenny Austin + Justin Huffman033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Akos Osvath
3W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
4.36
Rama Goud
24W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
4.29
Peter Paulsen
10W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
4.26
4.5
Christopher Cheng
2W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Dan Cummins
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Wil Saqueton
24W–32L career · 5 lines in 2025
14%85%<1%
4.14
Justin Huffman
23W–23L career · 9 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
4.07
Jeffrey Babb
6W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kenny Austin
3W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Raman Zhvirblia
10W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Scott Pope
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.