Teams

KY/PAD/CAMPBELL

2025 USTA COMBO DOUBLES 18 & OVER PADUCAH · 5.5 Adult Combo Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.80 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-01vs KY/PAD/ACREESplit 11
W#1 DoublesAmanda VanCura / Clarissa Wiles vs Kim Hoy / Kellie Steele7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKristy Campbell / Amy Boghof vs Shawne Seibert / Katrina Franklin1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-09-30vs KY/PAD/ACREEWon 20
W#2 DoublesEmily Okerson / Alicia Camacho vs Kim Hoy / Kellie Steele6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesBetsy Jennings / Pam Jones vs Katrina Franklin / Whitney Klaas6-3, 6-2
2025-09-23vs KY/PAD/ACREESplit 11
W#2 DoublesBetsy Jennings / Pam Jones vs Corinne Rudd / Kim Hoy7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAmy Boghof / Emily Okerson vs Gaby Acree / Katrina Franklin7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-09-13vs KY/PAD/ACREESplit 11
W#1 DoublesKristy Campbell / Alicia Camacho vs Kim Hoy / Allyson Robertson5-7, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSara Andrus / Emily Okerson vs Katrina Franklin / Ashley Provow3-6, 3-6
2025-09-04vs KY/PAD/ACREEWon 20
W#1 DoublesAmanda VanCura / Betsy Jennings vs Kellie Steele / Ashley Provow6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAmy Boghof / Kristy Campbell vs Whitney Klaas / Katrina Franklin6-2, 6-4
2025-08-29vs KY/PAD/ACREEWon 21
W#1 DoublesPam Jones / Clarissa Wiles vs Ashley Provow / Corinne Rudd6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKristy Campbell / Amanda VanCura vs Katrina Franklin / Allyson Robertson6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesEmily Okerson / Shannon Truitt vs Kim Hoy / Shawne Seibert3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Adult Combo Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Alicia Camacho
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.91
Betsy Jennings
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.74
Amanda VanCura
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.73
Pam Jones
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.52
Amy Boghof
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Clarissa Wiles
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Emily Okerson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Sara Andrus
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Shannon Truitt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Alicia Camacho
2W–3L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.92
2.5
Betsy Jennings
6W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.91
3
Amanda VanCura
15W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
Pam Jones
7W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%2%
2.73
3
Amy Boghof
4W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
2.52
2.5
Clarissa Wiles
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Emily Okerson
2W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sara Andrus
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Shannon Truitt
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.