Teams

Posey/Memphis

2026 Combo 18 & Over - Memphis · 5.5 18 & Over Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.67 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule1 upcoming · 4 played
Sep 17 9:00 AM
H.W. Cox Tennis Complex
2026-09-03vs Brand/MemphisLost 01
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Lomax / Ashley Presley vs Holly Cousar / Chancey Thompson1-6, 1-6
2026-08-27vs Moore/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesKerstin Wright / Caitlyn Arkwright vs Wendy Spas / Jenny Harmeier3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesAshley Presley / Emily Mcallister vs Angie Moore / Keneisha Fountain4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMary Margaret Posey / Whitney Greer vs Chandni Patel / Janet Grillis5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2026-08-20vs Glisson/MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesMary Margaret Posey / Leigh Lamb vs Mary Anne Pohlman / Shanleigh Walton3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesChristine Meisenheimer / Elyse Pickle vs Elizabeth Kennedy / Katie Howell2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKristen Bell / Leigh Ann Carkeet vs Alexandra Morin / Emily D Folk3-6, 2-6
2026-08-13vs Brand/MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesLeigh Ann Carkeet / Caitlyn Arkwright vs Holly Cousar / Chancey Thompson0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAshley Presley / Emily Mcallister vs Casey Tidwell / Laura Weaver3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMary Margaret Posey / Kristen Bell vs Elza McKenna / Kristi Crawford3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 5.5 18 & Over Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Tomlinson/Memphis2051436
2Gibbs/Memphis103006
3Mcmorran/Memphis1030013
4Brand/Memphis1030013
5Glisson/Memphis1021221
6Posey/Memphis0103636

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.25 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.74
Caitlyn Arkwright
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.57
Taylor Wisley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.48
Mary Margaret Posey
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Christine Meisenheimer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.14
Suzanne Lomax
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.08
Ashley Presley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
1.88
Whitney Greer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
1.87
Leigh Ann Carkeet
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Whitney Greer + Mary Margaret Posey2337% gamesnot enough data
Suzanne Lomax + Whitney Greer033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Caitlyn Arkwright
16W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
2.74
Taylor Wisley
12W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%29%71%
2.57
Mary Margaret Posey
23W–26L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%57%43%
2.48
2.5
Christine Meisenheimer
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Suzanne Lomax
12W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.14
2.5
Ashley Presley
0W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Whitney Greer
3W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.88
Leigh Ann Carkeet
3W–37L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.87

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.