Teams

Vineyards -

2022 Collier Adult 40 & Over Spring · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-05-16vs Naples Bay Resort - C. BradyLost 02
L#1 DoublesRenee DiGangi / Heather Haynes vs Gail Oroho / Christine Brady0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMelanie Howe / Margaret Callahan vs Dawn Jones / Linda Farrow4-6, 1-6
2022-05-09vs Bonita National - PohorenceSplit 11
W#1 DoublesHeather Haynes / Renee DiGangi vs Roxana Scott / Vivian Wong6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesMary Platten / Melanie Howe vs Joanne Fasy / Cindy Mitchell2-6, 3-6
2022-05-07vs Cambier - FerrettiSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRenee DiGangi / Heather Haynes vs Kerry Wells / Michele Ferretti6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMelanie Howe / Rae Eddy vs Sher Canada / Lisa Bowden-Zumstein0-6, 0-6
2022-04-25vs The Quarry - MooneyLost 02
L#1 DoublesRenee DiGangi / Sharyn Chabot vs Catherine Gallagher / Michelle Ruffing2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMelanie Howe / Rae Eddy vs Haewon Feltsman / Toni Mooney4-6, 4-6
2022-04-18vs Naples Grande - PerrinoWon 21
W#1 DoublesMargot Moran / Renee DiGangi vs Sandy Perrino / Michelle Minor6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSharyn Chabot / Mary Caruso vs Lisa Lamorgese / Diana Provence6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMelanie Howe / ANGELA SCHWERIN vs Kathryn Bullock / Kelly Smith2-6, 0-6
2022-04-11vs Fiddlers Creek - L. FarnhamLost 02
L#1 DoublesSharyn Chabot / Renee DiGangi vs Vicky Ramuta / Ulla Wolff7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMelanie Howe / Mary Caruso vs Laura Farnham / Kerry Turner6-7, 2-6
W#1 DoublesMargot Moran / Renee DiGangi vs Pamela Ginzburg / Lisa Hayes6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMary Caruso / Sharyn Chabot vs Adrienne Woodward / Wendy James6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMelanie Howe / Heather Haynes vs Deborah Stapleton / Ilene Glickman4-6, 3-6
2022-03-28vs COLLIER - Marco YMCA - NelzLost 01
L#1 DoublesMargot Moran / Renee DiGangi vs Lori Ceryak / Inge Lund2-6, 6-7
2022-03-21vs Heritage Bay - K. KeillorLost 01
L#1 DoublesMargot Moran / Melanie Howe vs Jennifer Amaya / Rachel Plisko1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Renee DiGangi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.77
Sharyn Chabot
published
2.73
Mary Caruso
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Melanie Howe
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Sharon Slozil
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melanie Howe + Renee DiGangi5948% gamesnot enough data
Melanie Howe + Mary Caruso21041% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Renee DiGangi
99W–70L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%37%63%
3.54
Sharyn Chabot
13W–28L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Mary Caruso
63W–87L career · 3 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
Melanie Howe
23W–105L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sharon Slozil
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.