Teams

LTC:Riley

2023 Flex Singles League - Women · 3.5 Women 1

1 player · average NTRP 3.00 / WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-09-22vs ETC:CorriveauLost 01
L#1 SinglesBrita Riley vs Emily Corriveau6-7, 2-4
2023-09-21vs ETC:PhilbinLost 01
L#1 SinglesBrita Riley vs Laurie Philbin5-7, 1-6
2023-08-25vs ETC:LewisLost 01
L#1 SinglesBrita Riley vs Andrea Lewis0-6, 2-6
2023-07-14vs ETC:YorkLost 01
L#1 SinglesBrita Riley vs Carol York4-6, 4-2, 0-1
2023-06-30vs MR:HuberLost 01
L#1 SinglesBrita Riley vs Meghan Huber3-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 3.5 Women 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ETC:Lewis0541225
2ETC:Corriveau0541236
3ETC:Philbin0532445
4ETC:York0523748
5MR:Huber0523855
6LTC:Riley05051053

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Brita Riley
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Brita Riley
1W–9L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.