Teams

MRC:TBD:Meyer

2022 ME Mixed 18 & Over Winter · 9.0 Mixed

8 players · average NTRP 4.20 / MAINE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-04-10vs RFC:GutGame:DwyerLost 12
L#1 DoublesSeth Meyer / Eve Harrison vs Matthew Mayer / Ellen Konieczko6-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesChristopher Kemp / Deanna Mao vs Michael Archibald / Polly Colvin MacKenzie7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesEric Lee / Georgia Ahlers vs Eric Berry-Sandelin / Anna Podnecky1-6, 1-6
2022-04-10vs RFC:GutGame:DwyerLost 12
L#1 DoublesChristopher Kemp / Deanna Mao vs Matthew Mayer / Ellen Konieczko2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesEric Lee / Georgia Ahlers vs Michael Archibald / Polly Colvin MacKenzie6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesSeth Meyer / Eve Harrison vs Eric Berry-Sandelin / Anna Podnecky6-3, 6-2
2022-03-27vs RFC:GutGame:DwyerLost 12
L#1 DoublesChristopher Kemp / Deanna Mao vs Lisa Finneral / Jesse Butler1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRichard Pickering / Tracy Fang vs Donna Dwyer / Rogier Henny6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSeth Meyer / Abigail Blakeley vs Dmitry Bam / Ellen Konieczko3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-03-27vs RFC:GutGame:DwyerLost 03
L#1 DoublesSeth Meyer / Abigail Blakeley vs Jesse Butler / Lisa Finneral4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesChristopher Kemp / Deanna Mao vs Donna Dwyer / Rogier Henny4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesRichard Pickering / Tracy Fang vs Dmitry Bam / Ellen Konieczko4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 9.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RFC:GutGame:Dwyer40937100
2MRC:TBD:Meyer043920140

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.97 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Christopher Kemp
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.20
Tracy Fang
published
4.17
Georgia Ahlers
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.86
Deanna Mao
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.85
Richard Pickering
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.76
Eve Harrison
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
Abigail Blakeley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
Seth Meyer
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deanna Mao + Christopher Kemp134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christopher Kemp
20W–11L career · 12 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tracy Fang
5W–0L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
4.20
4.5
Georgia Ahlers
17W–34L career · 4 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
4.17
4
Deanna Mao
110W–66L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.86
Richard Pickering
89W–48L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Eve Harrison
16W–42L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Abigail Blakeley
7W–5L career · type S · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Seth Meyer
20W–7L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.