Teams

IKTsibulsky

2022 Cap Spring USTA 18 & over · 4.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-12vs IGesher18Won 10
W#1 DoublesSuellen Bailey / Marybeth Margolis vs Carol Lekan / Nina Moock7-6, 7-6
2022-05-05vs LHOLDINGLost 01
L#1 DoublesSuellen Bailey / Tiffany Harris vs Lucy Holding / Ramona Holdstock4-6, 5-7
2022-04-28vs CBasonWon 10
W#1 DoublesSuellen Bailey / Marybeth Margolis vs Chris Bason / Cynthia Callahan6-1, 6-4
2022-04-22vs IGesher18Won 10
W#3 DoublesSuellen Bailey / Lynn Dixon vs Carolyn Mason / Carrie Vander Vennet6-1, 6-3
2022-04-21vs JKimLost 01
L#2 DoublesLynn Dixon / Jean Haas vs Dana Chapman / Sherrie Lefere1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-04-06vs LHOLDINGLost 01
L#3 DoublesJennifer Boyd / Kathleen Tsibulsky vs Alvina Oelhafen / Martha Schneider6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2022-03-10Won 10
W#3 DoublesJean Haas / Rosemary Peters vs Adrienne Padilla / Marissa Parrish6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Connie Peterson
published 4
3.81
Katherine Jeske
published
3.79
Suellen Bailey
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.42
Jean Haas
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.15
Kathleen Tsibulsky
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Rosemary Peters
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Connie Peterson
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.83
Katherine Jeske
12W–3L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Suellen Bailey
158W–92L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.79
3.5
Jean Haas
39W–39L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Kathleen Tsibulsky
53W–118L career · 1 line in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15
Rosemary Peters
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
3.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.