Teams

Titans

2021 DC Adult 18 & Over Summer · Adult 18 & Over Men 4.5

9 players · average NTRP 4.42 / WASHINGTON D.C.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-05-29vs Heavy HittersLost 02
L#1 DoublesMark Cassell / Scott Gelbman vs Thibaut Perol / Tomas Darsin2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBlake Nuwayhid / Dean Firouzian vs Chris Robinson / Rory Smith2-6, 2-6
2021-05-16vs Heavy HittersLost 01
L#1 DoublesScott Gelbman / Blake Nuwayhid vs Laith Layous / Vaughn Gatling3-6, 4-6
2021-05-15Won 10
W#2 DoublesScott Gelbman / Colyer Rublein vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-05-02Won 10
W#2 DoublesScott Gelbman / Alex Shaw vs Daniel Jacobs / Robert Crooks7-5, 4-2
2021-04-24vs Heavy HittersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesScott Gelbman / Blake Nuwayhid vs Laith Layous / Alex Guelzim2-6, 2-5
W#3 DoublesFranklin Doan / Jasen Fici vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-04-17Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBlake Nuwayhid / Colyer Rublein vs Matthew Townsend / Jeffrey Ocker3-6, 4-6
2021-04-11vs Heavy HittersLost 02
L#2 DoublesBlake Nuwayhid / Franklin Doan vs Jonathan Vissering / Toan Dao4-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDamani Eubanks / Jasen Fici vs Todd Campbell / Alex Guelzim1-6, 6-7
2021-04-03vs Capital CrushersWon 10
W#2 DoublesBlake Nuwayhid / Zachary Jones vs Joaquin Turley / David Eldracher2-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over Men 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.13 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Zachary Jones
published
4.28
Damani Eubanks
published 4.5
4.17
Scott Gelbman
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.12
Daniel Gendler
published 4.5
3.98
Blake Nuwayhid
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.94
Jasen Fici
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Daniel Jones
published 4
Mark Cassell
published
Thomas Jeffers
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Damani Eubanks + Daniel Gendler4255% games+4.7% vs expected
Scott Gelbman + Blake Nuwayhid71344% games+3.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Zachary Jones
30W–17L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
4.30
4.5
Damani Eubanks
19W–20L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
4.28
4.5
Scott Gelbman
73W–80L career · 5 lines in 2021
10%90%1%
4.17
4.5
Daniel Gendler
8W–9L career · no lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
4.12
4.5
Blake Nuwayhid
32W–61L career · 6 lines in 2021
57%43%<1%
3.98
4.5
Jasen Fici
102W–226L career · 2 lines in 2021
68%32%<1%
3.94
4
Daniel Jones
3W–7L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Mark Cassell
10W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Thomas Jeffers
7W–10L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.