Teams

Pelican Landing - Petkovich

2024 Collier Combo 50 & Over Spring · 7.5 Combo 50 & over - Women Day

13 players · average NTRP 3.80 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-05-13vs Olde Cypress - NavarroLost 02
L#2 DoublesCaroline Clawson / Tracy Halvin vs Lori Coates / Brenda Bensmiller4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesAnn Soper / Katie Hoggard vs Gretchen Landolt / Christine Siciliano5-7, 4-6
2024-05-06vs Fiddlers Creek - MichaelLost 01
L#3 DoublesAnn Soper / Ellen Davis vs Denise Marcos / Dorothea Farmer4-6, 3-6
2024-04-29vs Verona Walk - HaedeltLost 02
L#2 DoublesAnn Soper / Katie Hoggard vs Donna Digeronimo / Jeanette Thevening1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTracy Halvin / Ellen Davis vs Jennifer Ball / Ellen Harvey4-6, 3-6
2024-04-08Won 10
W#3 DoublesAnn Soper / Katie Hoggard vs Patti Peressini / Brenda Smith6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-04-01vs Players Club - J. WautersWon 10
W#3 DoublesTracy Halvin / Caroline Clawson vs Cathy de Bear / Lisa Renaud6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Combo 50 & over - Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Ann Soper
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.66
Deborah Washburn
published 4
3.58
Cynthia Emhardt
published 4
3.51
Marjie Killeen
published
3.35
Caroline Clawson
published 3.5
Ellen Davis
published 3.5
3.20
Jodi Petkovich
published
Karen Leenheers
published
Katie Hoggard
published
Marlene Tatham
published
PAMELA ARBOGAST
published
Tracy Halvin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracy Halvin + Marjie Killeen213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ann Soper
68W–33L career · 4 lines in 2024
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Deborah Washburn
102W–97L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
3.66
4
Cynthia Emhardt
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.58
Marjie Killeen
4W–12L career · no lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
3.51
3.5
Caroline Clawson
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%87%12%
3.35
3.5
Ellen Davis
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Linda Snowden-Kraftzenk
2W–9L career · no lines in 2024
99%1%<1%
3.20
Jodi Petkovich
1W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Karen Leenheers
27W–28L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Katie Hoggard
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Marlene Tatham
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
PAMELA ARBOGAST
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tracy Halvin
12W–20L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.