Teams

KY/LOU/KELLERMAN/DALTON

2022 USTA COMBO 18 & Over · 7.5 Women

19 players · average NTRP 3.80 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.10
Carmen Schreiber
published 4.5
3.94
Mary Grace Amato
published
3.72
Sandra McCaffrey
published
3.57
Laura Gaviglio
published
3.56
Rebekkah Rechter
published
3.54
Allison Hilles
published 4
3.45
Kellee Dicks
published
3.41
Lana McIntyre
published
3.32
Jae Neumann
published 3.5
3.26
Paula Adkins
published
3.18
Gail Stein
published 3.5
3.18
Cathy Morris
published 3.5
3.13
Julie Dailey
published
3.13
Laura Herder
published
3.07
3.01
Kimberly Polter
published
2.69
Stephanie Kellerman
published
2.47
Lindagarde Dalton
published
Stephanie Hilles
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lindagarde Dalton + Kimberly Polter2354% games+1.8% vs expected
Cathy Morris + Julie Dailey261653% games−1.3% vs expected
Cathy Morris + Kimberly Polter4450% games−2.0% vs expected
Stephanie Kellerman + Kimberly Polter2539% games−11.9% vs expected
Laura Gaviglio + Rebekkah Rechter2349% gamesnot enough data
Jae Neumann + Kellee Dicks4153% gamesnot enough data
Gail Stein + Lana McIntyre224 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly Polter + Sandra McCaffrey314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Carmen Schreiber
52W–33L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
4.10
Mary Grace Amato
47W–31L career · no lines in 2022
<1%67%32%
3.94
Sandra McCaffrey
76W–45L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.72
Laura Gaviglio
50W–40L career · no lines in 2022
>99%<1%<1%
3.57
Rebekkah Rechter
39W–53L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.56
4
Allison Hilles
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
3.54
Kellee Dicks
49W–77L career · no lines in 2022
64%36%<1%
3.45
Lana McIntyre
26W–66L career · no lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
Jae Neumann
14W–27L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
Paula Adkins
31W–36L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Gail Stein
14W–21L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Cathy Morris
55W–45L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.18
Julie Dailey
53W–49L career · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.13
Laura Herder
23W–27L career · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.13
Julianne Powell-Sutton
23W–31L career · no lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
3.07
Kimberly Polter
44W–40L career · no lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.01
Stephanie Kellerman
68W–84L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
Lindagarde Dalton
4W–13L career · no lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
2.47
Stephanie Hilles
9W–18L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.