Teams

WI Adult 65&O 7.0W MALT Riesch

2026 WI Adult 65 & Over · WI Adult 65 & Over 7.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.25 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-23vs WI Adult 65&O 7.0W MALT HerbertSplit 11
W#1 DoublesPaula Riesch / Kathleen Sherman vs Marilyn Herbert / Kimberlie Laderriere6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesDonna Neuber / Jill Bradshaw vs Bonnie Law / Jan Westemeier3-6, 3-6
2026-07-16vs WI Adult 65&O 7.0W MALT HerbertLost 12
L#1 DoublesCarolyn Layton / Debbie Weisbrod vs Jan Westemeier / Carole Carroll1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDonna Neuber / Paula Riesch vs Ann Camillo / Kimberlie Laderriere7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJill Bradshaw / Barbara Johnson vs Janet Homburg / Bonnie Law3-6, 6-7
2026-07-09vs WI Adult 65&O 7.0W MALT HerbertLost 03
L#1 DoublesKathryn Leide / Donna McCarthy-Beckett vs Carole Carroll / Marilyn Herbert4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesDebbie Weisbrod / Carolyn Layton vs Ann Camillo / Jan Westemeier2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPaula Riesch / Barbara Johnson vs Kimberlie Laderriere / Bonnie Law6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2026-06-25vs WI Adult 65&O 7.0W MALT HerbertWon 21
W#1 DoublesPaula Riesch / Debbie Weisbrod vs Ann Camillo / Kimberlie Laderriere6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDonna McCarthy-Beckett / Kathleen Sherman vs Marilyn Herbert / Janet Homburg6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJill Bradshaw / Donna Neuber vs Jan Westemeier / Carole Carroll2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-06-24vs WI Adult 65&O 7.0W MALT HerbertLost 12
W#1 DoublesKathleen Sherman / Donna McCarthy-Beckett vs Jan Westemeier / Marilyn Herbert6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesPaula Riesch / Barbara Johnson vs Janet Homburg / Kimberlie Laderriere6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKathryn Leide / Carolyn Layton vs Carole Carroll / Ann Camillo4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-06-19vs WI Adult 65&O 7.0W MALT HerbertLost 12
L#1 DoublesDebbie Weisbrod / Kathleen Sherman vs Kimberlie Laderriere / Jan Westemeier6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDonna McCarthy-Beckett / Kathryn Leide vs Ann Camillo / Carole Carroll4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesPaula Riesch / Barbara Johnson vs Marilyn Herbert / Janet Homburg6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · WI Adult 65 & Over 7.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WI Adult 65&O 7.0W MALT Herbert4211721183
2WI Adult 65&O 7.0W MALT Riesch2471124161

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Paula Riesch
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.15
Debbie Weisbrod
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.01
Donna Neuber
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.94
Jill Bradshaw
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.87
Carolyn Layton
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Donna McCarthy-Beckett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Kathleen Sherman
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donna McCarthy-Beckett + Kathleen Sherman303 matchesnot enough data
Donna Neuber + Paula Riesch303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paula Riesch
53W–36L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Debbie Weisbrod
12W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
14%86%1%
3.15
Donna Neuber
13W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.01
Jill Bradshaw
68W–47L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Carolyn Layton
24W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
2.87
Donna McCarthy-Beckett
4W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kathleen Sherman
9W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.