Teams

EPerkins 7.5

2022 Capital Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-10-16Won 10
W#1 DoublesScott St John / Adam Dailey vs Gabe Thomas / Tony Richardson6-1, 6-4
2022-10-09vs ITCMunceHG2022Split 11
W#1 DoublesScott St John / Doug Silverman vs Michael Sellers / Timothy Koves7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRobert Weaver / Adam Dailey vs Daniel Hill / Jason McGeorge6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2022-10-08vs CLav Wakefield 7.5 18+Won 10
W#2 DoublesMatthew Horney / Adam Dailey vs Jeffrey Monaghen / Christopher Bricker6-3, 6-3
2022-09-21Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDarin Meyer / Adam Dailey vs Jason Tuttle / David Hill1-6, 5-7
2022-09-19vs SFu | BKeisnerWon 30
W#1 DoublesScott St John / Adam Dailey vs Miguel Materin / David Steele6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDarin Meyer / Howard Marsilio vs Justin Prins / Reece Desonglo6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMatthew Horney / Doug Silverman vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-09-18vs SWingo18+ Seven OaksWon 10
W#3 DoublesDarin Meyer / Camilo Pena vs Joseph Brown / Gavin Mazurak3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-08-28vs SLlewellyn CAP 7.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesDarin Meyer / Camilo Pena vs Benjamin Albright / Maxwell Gregson5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2022-08-14vs IBTownsend/BRoss 7.5 ComboWon 10
W#2 DoublesRyan Lindsay / Adam Dailey vs Tony Stewart / David Roberts6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Adam Dailey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.83
Matthew Horney
published
3.79
Darin Meyer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.79
Ryan Lindsay
published
Camilo Pena
published 4
3.74
Sterling Thomas
published
3.69
Scott St John
published
3.64
Howard Marsilio
published 4
3.61
Doug Silverman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.06
Edward Perkins
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Darin Meyer + Scott St John123 matchesnot enough data
Adam Dailey + Doug Silverman213 matchesnot enough data
Matthew Horney + Sterling Thomas123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Adam Dailey
148W–68L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.90
Matthew Horney
9W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Darin Meyer
60W–49L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.79
Ryan Lindsay
12W–3L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Camilo Pena
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sterling Thomas
12W–8L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
Scott St John
3W–10L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Howard Marsilio
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
3.64
3.5
Doug Silverman
99W–41L career · type A · 2 lines in 2022
<1%19%81%
3.61
3.5
Edward Perkins
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.06

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.