Teams

GEPTA/55&over/7.0W/Baeza/FB

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA ADULT 55 & OVER LEAGUE

15 players · average NTRP 3.75 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings6 teams · 2025 USA ADULT 55 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/Missirian/55&over/7.0W8225515205
2GEPTA/55&over/7.0W/Viramontes/TW7321927253
3GEPTA/55&over/7.0W/Gallagher/NMSU64141640289
4GEPTA/55&over/7.0W/Baeza/FB55141633276
5GEPTA/55&over/7.0W/Zubiate/EPTC#246121841300
6GEPTA/55&over/7.0W/Cartwright/EPCC01042653337

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Cheryl Ledford
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.23
Claire Brandon
usually #2 Doubles 59%, also #1 Doubles 24% · published 3.5
Ellen Hughes
usually #1 Doubles 41%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
Ellen Michnovicz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Gerla Gallardo
usually #2 Doubles 53%, also #1 Doubles 39% · published
Gerrianne Lockhart-Walker
usually #3 Doubles 53%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
Guadalupe Castillo
usually #3 Doubles 47%, also #1 Doubles 26% · published
Guadalupe Saenz
usually #1 Doubles 52%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Isela Rayon
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Jeanette Tan
usually #3 Doubles 58%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Margaret Baeza
usually #3 Doubles 35%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Monica Morga
usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Patricia Arreola
usually #3 Doubles 48%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published
Ramona Beard
usually #2 Doubles 53%, also #3 Doubles 35% · published
Ursula Morawietz
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 21% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Guadalupe Castillo + Ursula Morawietz14957% gamesnot enough data
Gerla Gallardo + Guadalupe Castillo12656% gamesnot enough data
Gerrianne Lockhart-Walker + Patricia Arreola8461% gamesnot enough data
Gerla Gallardo + Ursula Morawietz7356% gamesnot enough data
Gerla Gallardo + Ellen Hughes6261% gamesnot enough data
Claire Brandon + Ellen Hughes2548% gamesnot enough data
Ramona Beard + Guadalupe Castillo5262% gamesnot enough data
Ramona Beard + Margaret Baeza3447% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cheryl Ledford
37W–52L career · 14 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
3.5
Claire Brandon
36W–46L career · 17 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Ellen Hughes
74W–86L career · 22 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ellen Michnovicz
44W–69L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Gerla Gallardo
96W–62L career · 36 lines in 2025
not enough data
Gerrianne Lockhart-Walker
61W–87L career · 30 lines in 2025
not enough data
Guadalupe Castillo
96W–65L career · 19 lines in 2025
not enough data
Guadalupe Saenz
71W–59L career · 21 lines in 2025
not enough data
Isela Rayon
57W–46L career · 24 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jeanette Tan
36W–51L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data
Margaret Baeza
23W–26L career · 20 lines in 2025
not enough data
Monica Morga
70W–72L career · 24 lines in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Arreola
45W–59L career · 23 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ramona Beard
54W–60L career · 17 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ursula Morawietz
40W–27L career · 14 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.