Teams

RMTC RED

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 5.0 - 18 & OVER

7 players · average NTRP 5.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-05-23vs MLF REDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSean Hollister / Brian Oldfield vs Zach Hartman / Marc Weiner6-1, 7-5
L#1 SinglesThiago Najman Nejm vs Nolan Polley1-6, 2-6
2024-05-11vs CSU GREENWon 21
L#1 DoublesBrian Oldfield / William Gury vs Vinh-Hung Le / Jacob Escobedo4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesSean Hollister vs Max Petrak6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesHugo Leenders / Kendall Chitambar vs John Kneisley / Jake Milliken6-2, 6-2
2024-05-09vs CSU GREENSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSean Hollister / Brian Oldfield vs Jacob Escobedo / John Kneisley6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKendall Chitambar / Peter Reiss vs Sam Bell / Vinh-Hung Le4-6, 3-6
2024-05-02vs MLF REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesSean Hollister / Oscar Valenzuela vs Andy Benson / Lucas Martin3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesBrian Oldfield vs Nolan Polley2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKendall Chitambar / Peter Reiss vs Peter Conaty / Cameron Mount6-7, 3-6
2024-04-25vs MEA YELLOWWon 10
W#1 DoublesSean Hollister / Brian Oldfield vs Francois Botha / Chad Tsuda6-4, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 5.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Brian Oldfield
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 5
Hugo Leenders
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
Kendall Chitambar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Peter Reiss
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sean Hollister
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Thiago Najman Nejm
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
William Gury
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sean Hollister + Brian Oldfield404 matchesnot enough data
Kendall Chitambar + Peter Reiss123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Brian Oldfield
9W–5L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
5
Hugo Leenders
6W–3L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Kendall Chitambar
6W–6L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Peter Reiss
2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sean Hollister
21W–8L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Thiago Najman Nejm
6W–12L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
William Gury
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.